leading contentions

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "leading contentions" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the main arguments or points of disagreement in a debate or discussion. Example: "The leading contentions in the debate centered around climate change policies and their economic implications."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

If a link is broken, any RTS retrial cannot increase successful transmission (Figure 8) but only MAC contention degree, leading to more MAC contention overhead.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Such high-management traffic leads to more load and contention leading to higher chance that the lookup request cannot be completed correctly [36].

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Access to the Whistler Sliding Centre was a point of contention leading to the Vancouver Olympics, but concerns had seemingly abated before Kumaritashvili's crash Friday morning.

The New York Times - Sports

However, the Court of Appeal rejected the Home Secretary's contention leading to a Supreme Court hearing in June and today's verdict upholding that decision that the Home Office had acted illegally.

Independent

The race had been run at a serene pace, which left all the leading contenders in contention, but it suddenly erupted into life after 21 miles when Sumgong crashed to the floor while looking at her watch, after being tripped up by Aselefech Mergia.

The Guardian - Sport

This is due to that in this case, frequent RTS retrials intensify the MAC contention, leading to a decrease in MAC effective throughput.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Once the Mets reeled off enough victories to insert themselves into the division race briefly, Manager Bobby Valentine began getting credit for leading the team into contention.

The New York Times - Sports

This is because as m increases, there are more resources in the system to execute the jobs, leading to a lower contention for resources.

Journal of Cloud Computing

Dutch coach Clarence Seedorf has catapulted Milan - struggling in the bottom half when he replaced Massimiliano Allegri in January - into European contention by leading them to a sixth win in their last seven league matches.

BBC

"I had been suffering a bit of arm pump all week and I think the extra tension of leading and being in contention for the win made it worse," said William.

BBC

From this figure, we can see that the collision probability increases as n increases when d=5,10 ms. However, for each n, the collision probability when d=5 ms is obviously larger than that when d=10 ms. The reason is that the larger d greatly alleviates the contention intensity, leading to a lower collision probability.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "leading contentions", ensure the context clearly establishes a debate or discussion where disagreements are present. This phrase is most effective when introducing a summary of the key points of conflict.

Common error

Avoid using "leading contentions" in situations where there is no actual disagreement or debate. This phrase implies a level of conflict, and using it inappropriately can create a misleading impression of discord.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "leading contentions" functions as a noun phrase that identifies the most important disagreements or points of dispute in a given context. Ludwig AI confirms it is grammatically correct and usable in English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

33%

Encyclopedias

33%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "leading contentions" is a grammatically sound phrase used to identify the primary disagreements in a debate or discussion. While not particularly common, Ludwig AI ensures its validity for use in English writing. It's most appropriate in neutral to formal contexts, such as news reports, academic papers, or formal discussions. Remember to use this phrase when accurately summarizing key points of dispute and prefer alternatives if a more informal tone is desired. The examples show its usage across diverse sources, confirming its place in the English lexicon.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

major areas of contention

Uses "areas of contention" to specify the scope of the disagreements.

primary disagreements

Replaces "contentions" with "disagreements", focusing on the points of conflict.

main points of dispute

Rephrases the entire phrase to emphasize the key issues under discussion.

key arguments

Simplifies the phrase by using "arguments" instead of "contentions".

foremost disagreements

Replaces "leading" with "foremost" to denote the most important disagreements.

primary points of argument

Rephrases the sentence to use 'points of argument' instead of 'contentions'.

central controversies

Substitutes "contentions" with "controversies", highlighting the debated nature of the points.

chief points at issue

Replaces "contentions" with "points at issue", which is more formal.

significant disputes

Replaces both words with simpler alternatives that retain the core meaning.

principal bones of contention

Uses a more idiomatic expression, "bones of contention", to refer to the main points of disagreement.

FAQs

How can I use "leading contentions" in a sentence?

You can use "leading contentions" to refer to the primary points of disagreement in a debate or discussion. For example: "The "leading contentions" in the climate change debate involve the economic costs of implementing green policies".

What are some alternatives to "leading contentions"?

Alternatives include "primary disagreements", "main points of dispute", or "key arguments". The best choice depends on the specific context and desired level of formality.

Is "leading contentions" formal or informal?

"Leading contentions" is relatively formal. Simpler alternatives like "main disagreements" may be more appropriate for informal settings.

What's the difference between "leading contentions" and "main arguments"?

While similar, "leading contentions" specifically implies disagreement or dispute. "Main arguments" is more neutral and can refer to the key points in a discussion even without conflict. Therefore, "main arguments" can be a good substitute.