Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

later struck

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "later struck" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something happened after a previous event, often in a narrative or descriptive context. Example: "After the initial agreement, the deal was later struck between the two parties."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Sport

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Higuaín later struck another.

City preservation authorities later struck a compromise.

News & Media

The New York Times

He later struck out on his own.

News & Media

The New York Times

Representative King later struck a more conciliatory note.

News & Media

The New York Times

(Universal later struck a licensing deal with YouTube).

(The subsequent ballot measure passed, though it was later struck down).

News & Media

The New Yorker

(Portions of the act were later struck down in various legal challenges).

The truth commission pact was later struck down by an Argentinian court.

News & Media

Independent

This clause was later struck out as "important yet doubtful" but the damage was done.

News & Media

The Guardian

Legislators overrode the veto, but measures that dealt private employers were later struck down in court.

News & Media

The New York Times

Mr. Rodriguez's lawyers contend that Nixzmary's mother, Nixzaliz Santiago, who will be tried later, struck the fatal blow.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "later struck" to clearly indicate a sequence of events where one action directly follows another. This construction is effective in narratives and reports to maintain a chronological flow.

Common error

Avoid using "later struck" when a more direct, active voice would be clearer. For instance, instead of "The city was later struck by a storm", consider "A storm later struck the city" for improved readability.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "later struck" functions as a temporal marker combined with an action verb. It indicates that an event occurred at a time subsequent to a previously mentioned event. As shown in Ludwig, it connects events in a chronological sequence.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

66%

Wiki

22%

Sport

6%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Science

2%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "later struck" is a versatile construction used to indicate a sequence of events, highlighting that one action followed another. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread usage across diverse contexts. The phrase functions as a temporal marker and action verb, primarily serving to narrate events chronologically. While generally neutral in tone, it can be adapted for different levels of formality. Examples show it appears most frequently in news and media, and wiki articles. Remember to use "later struck" to effectively connect events in time, ensuring a clear and chronological flow in your writing.

FAQs

How can I use "later struck" in a sentence?

You can use "later struck" to describe an event that happened after a previous event. For example, "The initial negotiations failed, but a deal was "later struck" between the parties".

What are some alternatives to "later struck"?

Some alternatives include "subsequently hit", "thereafter impacted", or "eventually collided", depending on the specific context and desired nuance.

Is there a difference between "later struck" and "was later struck"?

"Later struck" implies a more active voice, while "was later struck" is passive. The choice depends on whether you want to emphasize the actor or the receiver of the action. For example, "The agreement was "later struck"" emphasizes the agreement, while "They "later struck" a deal" emphasizes the actors.

Which is more formal: "later struck" or "subsequently impacted"?

"Subsequently impacted" is generally more formal than ""later struck"". The choice depends on the tone and audience of your writing. Academic or professional contexts might benefit from the formality of "subsequently impacted".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: