lasting three hours

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "lasting three hours" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe the duration of an event or activity. Example: "The meeting is scheduled for 10 AM, lasting three hours, so we should finish by 1 PM."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

23 human-written examples

Highlights: As more than a million fans learned at concerts last year, McCartney gives great value for money, with shows often lasting three hours.

Los Angeles Times

For a musical work lasting three hours without plot or narrative, that is pretty good going.

The Guardian - Books

A primer lasting three hours provides "a tactical look at civilian life".

The New Yorker

Long lines, lasting three hours in some cases, greeted customers trying to tap their funds at a former Dime Savings Bank.

The New York Times

Until 2010, candidates also took an essay, lasting three hours, in which they had to write about just one word, like "innocence" or "error".

Independent

The 24-year-old Scot beat Argentina's Gustavo Fernández 6-3, 6-7, 9-7 in a match lasting three hours and 13 minutes to become the first Briton to reach a grand slam men's singles wheelchair final.

The Guardian - Sport

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

37 human-written examples

Xbox One's Indie Strategy Isn't Whichng Just Yended

Vice

The dinner lasted three hours.

The New Yorker

His audition lasted three hours.

The New York Times

And it lasts three hours.

Independent

The drafting lasted three hours.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing the duration of events, consider using "lasting three hours" for clarity and conciseness.

Common error

Avoid using "lasting three hours" with subjects that cannot logically have a duration. For example, it would be incorrect to say "The building lasting three hours" unless you are referring to a specific event within the building that had that duration.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "lasting three hours" functions as a descriptive element, modifying a noun to indicate its duration. Ludwig examples show its use in describing the length of events, meetings, and activities. It emphasizes the continuous period over which something extends.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

28%

Wiki

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "lasting three hours" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to describe the duration of an event or activity. Ludwig AI validates that it's correct and usable in written English. Predominantly found in News & Media and Science, this phrase serves to inform about the time commitment. When using the phrase, ensure that the subject logically has a duration. For alternatives, consider "spanning three hours" or "a three-hour duration" for similar meanings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

spanning three hours

Uses "spanning" instead of "lasting", implying a coverage of time.

a three-hour duration

Emphasizes the duration as a specific time period.

three hours in length

Focuses on the length of the event or activity.

for a duration of three hours

More formal and explicit about the duration.

having a three-hour runtime

Specifically refers to the running time of something like a movie or event.

occupying three hours

Highlights the time taken up by the event.

consuming three hours

Implies that the event uses up three hours of time.

extending over three hours

Suggests the event stretches out over that period.

a three-hour period

States a period of time, but requires further context.

taking three hours

Focuses on the time required for something to complete.

FAQs

How can I use "lasting three hours" in a sentence?

You can use "lasting three hours" to describe the duration of an event or activity. For example, "The meeting is scheduled for 10 AM, "lasting three hours", so we should finish by 1 PM."

What are some alternatives to saying "lasting three hours"?

Alternatives include phrases like "spanning three hours", "a three-hour duration", or "three hours in length".

Is it correct to say "the duration was lasting three hours"?

While grammatically understandable, it's more common and concise to say "the duration was "three hours"" or "it was a "three-hour duration"".

What is the difference between "lasting three hours" and "for three hours"?

"Lasting three hours" describes the continuous duration of an event or activity. "For three hours" indicates the time dedicated to it. For example, "The concert was "lasting three hours"" versus "We practiced for "three hours"".