Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

lasting for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"lasting for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to a period of time that continues over a certain amount of time. Example sentence: The cold weather lasted for two weeks.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Secondly, in vivo protein protein interactions can be transient (e.g. lasting for milliseconds to seconds) or long lasting (lasting for hours to days) and biochemically stable.

Science

ASN Neuro

Hangovers were lasting for days.

News & Media

The Times

work is lasting for another reason.

News & Media

The New York Times

That led to more conversations, some lasting for hours.

News & Media

The New York Times

An incredible inflation got under way, lasting for decades.

A third stall warning sounded, lasting for about a minute.

News & Media

The New York Times

The activity started with ripple patterns over the whole sky, lasting for almost one hour.

But the magic, doctors say, is superficial, lasting for 8 to 12 hours at a time.

That's partly because car are more reliable and lasting for longer.

News & Media

The Guardian

They were also asked about the long-term effects – those lasting for more than two weeks.

News & Media

The Guardian

So to keep a wood lasting for centuries it was constantly renewing itself.

News & Media

The Guardian
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing the duration of events, using "lasting for" helps clarify the length of time something continues. For example, "The meeting lasted for two hours" provides a clear indication of the meeting's duration.

Common error

Be careful not to confuse "lasting for" with similar phrases that imply causation or purpose. While "lasting for" indicates duration, phrases like "for the purpose of" or "for the sake of" imply intention or reason, so it's important to use the right phrase in the right context.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "lasting for" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase modifying a verb or noun, specifying the duration of an action, event, or state. Ludwig provides many examples illustrating this function.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

35%

Encyclopedias

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Unknown/unmatched sources

5%

Social Media

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "lasting for" is a grammatically correct and very common prepositional phrase used to indicate the duration of an event, condition, or state. As confirmed by Ludwig, its primary function is to specify how long something continues, making it essential for providing temporal context. It appears frequently in scientific, news, and encyclopedia sources, maintaining a neutral register suitable for both formal and informal communication. When writing, ensure clarity by avoiding confusion with phrases indicating causation or purpose, and utilize this phrase to precisely define the length of time something persists.

FAQs

How can I use "lasting for" in a sentence?

You can use "lasting for" to describe the duration of an event, condition, or object. For example, "The effects of the medication are "lasting for several hours"" or "The drought was "lasting for several years"".

What are some alternatives to "lasting for"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "enduring for", "continuing for", or "persisting for". Each alternative carries a slightly different nuance regarding the nature of the duration.

Is it grammatically correct to say "lasting for"?

Yes, "lasting for" is grammatically correct and commonly used in English. It serves to specify the duration of an action or state. Ludwig confirms this with numerous examples.

How does "lasting for" differ from "for lasting"?

"Lasting for" describes a duration, while "for lasting" doesn't form a common or grammatically sound phrase in most contexts. You might use "for lasting results" where "lasting" acts as an adjective describing "results", but that's different from indicating duration.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: