lasted more than

USAGE SUMMARY

"lasted more than" is a perfectly correct and usable phrase in written English.
It typically refers to the length of time something took to occur or complete. For example, "The party lasted more than 8 hours."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

Their trial lasted more than four years.

The New Yorker

Few lasted more than a year.

The New York Times

That match lasted more than five hours.

The New York Times - Sports

The performance lasted more than eighteen hours).

The New Yorker

This situation lasted more than two centuries.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The session lasted more than six hours.

The New York Times

The dinner lasted more than an hour.

The New York Times

The protest lasted more than eight hours.

The New York Times

Neither series lasted more than a season.

The New Yorker

Their marriage lasted more than 20 years.

The New York Times

They all lasted more than one day.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing the duration of events, ensure that the subject is clearly defined and that the time period is specific. For example, instead of "The meeting lasted more than a while", specify "The meeting lasted more than two hours".

Common error

Avoid vague timeframes after the phrase "lasted more than". Instead of saying "The effect lasted more than some time", be specific: "The effect lasted more than a week".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "lasted more than" functions as a duration descriptor, indicating that an event, condition, or process extended for a period exceeding a specified amount of time. Ludwig AI confirms this as a standard usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

63%

Science

23%

Encyclopedias

2%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Wiki

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "lasted more than" is a common and grammatically sound way to describe the duration of an event or condition exceeding a specified time. Ludwig AI confirms its appropriate use. It appears frequently in news media and scientific publications to convey length or persistence. When employing this phrase, ensure time frames are specific and avoid vague language. Consider alternatives like "persisted longer than" or "went on for over" for stylistic variation. Remember to specify clear time periods when using "lasted more than" to avoid ambiguity and ensure clarity in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

persisted longer than

Replaces "lasted" with "persisted", emphasizing the continuation despite potential obstacles.

exceeded a duration of

Changes the verb and introduces a more formal tone, focusing on the exceeding of a duration.

went on for over

Uses a phrasal verb to indicate duration, making it slightly more informal.

carried on for longer than

Similar to "went on for over" but can imply a more deliberate or planned continuation.

extended beyond

Implies a limit was surpassed, adding a sense of unexpected continuation.

stretched out for more than

Uses "stretched out" to convey a sense of lengthiness, often implying a wearying duration.

endured beyond

Similar to "extended beyond", but with a connotation of hardship or resilience.

continued for a period greater than

More verbose and formal, emphasizing the period of time involved.

had a duration surpassing

Uses more technical language, suitable for scientific or formal contexts.

spanned a time frame exceeding

Introduces the concept of a "time frame", making it suitable for describing events with defined start and end points.

FAQs

How can I use "lasted more than" in a sentence?

Use "lasted more than" to indicate that something continued for a duration exceeding a specified time. For example, "The trial "lasted more than" four years".

What can I say instead of "lasted more than"?

You can use alternatives like "exceeded a duration of", "went on for over", or "persisted longer than" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "the effect lasted longer than a month" instead of "the effect lasted more than a month"?

Both are grammatically correct and convey the same meaning. "Longer than" might sound slightly more informal than "more than", but in most contexts, they are interchangeable.

What's the difference between "lasted more than" and "continued for more than"?

"Lasted more than" typically refers to the entire duration of an event or condition, while "continued for more than" may emphasize a phase or portion of an ongoing process. For example, "The storm lasted more than a day," versus, "Negotiations continued for more than a week before reaching a conclusion".