Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

lasted for weeks

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "lasted for weeks" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe an event, situation, or condition that continued over a period of several weeks. Example: "The storm lasted for weeks, causing significant damage to the coastal areas."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Unlike last year, when Hideki Irabu failed to hustle and set off a controversy that lasted for weeks, the Yankees left here seamlessly.

Protests along the Dakota Access route lasted for weeks.

Revis made sure the food lasted for weeks.

I've had onions that have lasted for weeks in the fridge.

The second lasted for weeks in 1972 and covered several Soviet cities.

The rioting lasted for weeks, but was most ferocious in the first few days.

News & Media

The New York Times

A raucous celebration soon followed, and the afterglow lasted for weeks.

The Miz against Sheamus soon followed in another feud that has lasted for weeks.

News & Media

Independent

Each lasted for weeks or months, but so far none was closely followed by a significant quake.

It was bright enough to be seen during the day, and its great luminosity lasted for weeks.

Encyclopedias

Britannica

The 1936 tercentenary was marked with conferences that lasted for weeks and delegations from hundreds of universities around the world.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "lasted for weeks" to clearly indicate a duration of several weeks, providing a specific timeframe for the event or condition you are describing.

Common error

Avoid using "lasted for weeks" when a more precise timeframe is available. If you know the specific number of weeks, use that instead (e.g., "lasted for three weeks") to provide greater clarity.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "lasted for weeks" primarily functions as a verbal phrase within a clause, indicating the duration of an event, state, or condition. It modifies the subject by specifying how long it endured. Ludwig provides numerous examples of its usage in diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

67%

Academia

17%

Science

16%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "lasted for weeks" is a common and grammatically correct way to describe a duration of several weeks. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and provides numerous examples across diverse contexts, primarily in news and media, academia, and scientific publications. It serves to specify the timeframe of an event or condition. When writing, ensure that the phrase accurately reflects the duration and use more precise timeframes when possible. Alternatives include "persisted for weeks" or "continued for weeks". By following these guidelines, you can effectively use "lasted for weeks" to enhance your writing.

FAQs

How can I use "lasted for weeks" in a sentence?

"Lasted for weeks" is used to describe something that continued for a period of several weeks. For example, "The intense heatwave "lasted for weeks", causing widespread drought."

What are some alternatives to "lasted for weeks"?

Alternatives include "persisted for weeks", "continued for weeks", or "extended for weeks". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.

Is it more correct to say "lasted for weeks" or "lasted several weeks"?

Both "lasted for weeks" and "lasted several weeks" are correct. "Lasted several weeks" is slightly more specific, but "lasted for weeks" is perfectly acceptable when the exact number of weeks is not important or known.

What's the difference between "lasted for weeks" and "lasted for months"?

"Lasted for weeks" indicates a duration of multiple weeks, while "lasted for months" indicates a duration of multiple months. The key difference is the timeframe; use the phrase that accurately reflects the length of the event or condition.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: