lacks in-depth

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "lacks in-depth" is correct and can be used in written English.
For example, you could say that the article "lacks in-depth analysis of the issue." This phrase is used to describe something that is missing a thorough examination or exploration.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

The search engine said improvements to its algorithm meant unoriginal content that lacks in-depth analysis is now more likely to appear lower down its search results.

The Guardian

The research on mobile learning in science lacks in-depth investigation of the learning process.

Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning

The evaluation of their applicability and associated risk is of paramount importance and lacks in-depth research.

Environmental Systems Research

There is a small collection of correspondence, which, while containing items illustrative of the variety of Freund's interests, lacks in-depth treatment of any individual concern.

University of Chicago

The traditional pre-setting method of shape standard curve is mainly based on experience and lacks in-depth theoretical analysis, which is the weakest part in shape theory models.

Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

Because of their shorter tenure, they also lack in-depth knowledge that others in the organization possess.

Harvard Business Review

But live streams are currently hard to find and lack in-depth information about the events being documented.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

However, these models lack in-depth experimental validation, in part because void coalescence is difficult to capture experimentally.

Acta Materialia

Educators lacked in-depth knowledge of STEM careers, and, as a consequence, they were not prepared to guide students to those fields.

Encyclopedia Britannica

It said a common trait of the opinions expressed was that they "lack in-depth knowledge" of the new law.

BBC

In addition, it has been suggested that clinicians lack in-depth knowledge and experience in using the framework [ 4, 10].

Disability and Rehabilitation

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "lacks in-depth" to critique analyses, research, or explanations that don't delve sufficiently into a topic. This phrase is suitable for academic, professional, and journalistic contexts.

Common error

Avoid using "lacks in-depth" in casual conversations or informal writing. Simpler phrases like "not detailed enough" or "too basic" are more appropriate for those settings.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "lacks in-depth" functions as an adjective phrase, typically used to describe a deficiency in the thoroughness or detail of something, such as an analysis or investigation. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct and suitable for formal writing.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

32%

Science

32%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

4%

Wiki

4%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "lacks in-depth" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression to indicate a deficiency in the thoroughness or detail of an analysis, explanation, or exploration. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is generally acceptable for use in academic, professional, and journalistic contexts. While frequent in news, science, and academic sources, it is less common in encyclopedias, wikis, or business settings. When writing, use "lacks in-depth" to provide specific and helpful critiques, while remembering to adjust for informality when communicating in casual settings. Alternatives like "deficient in detail" or "superficial" can serve as substitutes depending on the context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

lacking thoroughness

Emphasizes the absence of a comprehensive approach.

shallow understanding

Highlights a limited and superficial comprehension.

without detailed analysis

Points out the absence of an elaborate examination.

deficient in detail

Focuses on the absence of specific information or elaboration.

lacks comprehensive coverage

Highlights the lack of complete and extensive treatment of the subject.

inadequate exploration

Focuses on the insufficient investigation of a topic.

superficial

Highlights the lack of thoroughness and depth of analysis.

limited scope

Emphasizes the restricted range or extent of coverage.

cursory treatment

Indicates a brief and superficial handling of a subject.

wanting in profundity

Highlights the absence of intellectual depth or insight.

FAQs

How can I use "lacks in-depth" in a sentence?

You can use "lacks in-depth" to describe something that is missing a thorough or detailed analysis. For example, "The report "lacks in-depth" analysis of the economic factors."

What are some alternatives to "lacks in-depth"?

Alternatives to "lacks in-depth" include "deficient in detail", "superficial", or "lacking thoroughness". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it better to say "lacks depth" or "lacks in-depth"?

Both "lacks depth" and ""lacks in-depth"" are acceptable, but ""lacks in-depth"" emphasizes the absence of a thorough examination more explicitly.

What does it mean when something "lacks in-depth" analysis?

When something ""lacks in-depth"" analysis, it means that the examination or exploration of the topic is not thorough, detailed, or comprehensive enough. It suggests that important aspects may have been overlooked or not sufficiently investigated.