lacks importance

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "lacks importance" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe something that is not significant or does not hold much value in a particular context. Example: "While the details of the meeting were discussed, the topic of lunch options truly lacks importance in the grand scheme of things."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

But that doesn't mean that it lacks importance.

The New Yorker

This does not mean school or city-level lacks importance, but may suggest that city boundaries comparing only state capitals do not capture differences that shape the relevant environment for bullying occurrence [ 56].

BMC Pediatrics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Ordinary folk are held incapable of the profundity of true tragedy; their disasters lack importance and beauty and are merely sad.

The New York Times - Books

It might lack importance.

BMC Medical Education

This dilemma possibly exists because the day's supply in the PER may be viewed by the pharmacist as a field lacking importance as it is not used on the prescription label.

BMJ Open

But this does not mean that race lacks historical importance.

The New York Times

Another minor contraption is represented in the drawing of an 1849 device used for "Buoying Vessels Over Shoals," making up in provenance what it lacks in importance; its inventor was Abraham Lincoln.

The New York Times - Arts

Or the court may disagree with the result but decide the legal issue at stake lacks statewide importance.

Los Angeles Times

Only occasionally were species from other genera such as Ae. fulvus, Ae. scapularis, and Psorophora albipes found to be infected, but with only 1 isolate (2 ); thus, these genera lack importance in the maintenance of YFV in nature.

Emerging Infectious Diseases

The conditions of carriage may lack the importance of other, more pressing social issues.

The New Yorker

When it does, some will suffer more than others; but, with a few exceptions lacking systemic importance, widespread distress and crises need not occur.

The Guardian - Business

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "lacks importance" to clearly convey that something is not significant or relevant within a specific context. It's particularly effective when contrasting it with elements that are important.

Common error

Avoid using "lacks importance" when a more nuanced term like "is less relevant" would be more appropriate. Overstating can diminish the impact of your writing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "lacks importance" functions primarily as a predicate expressing that a particular subject does not possess significance or relevance. Ludwig confirms this usage through various examples, demonstrating its role in conveying a diminished value or consequence.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "lacks importance" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression to indicate that something is not significant or relevant. Ludwig AI confirms this, providing several examples across diverse sources. While "lacks importance" is generally acceptable, considering related phrases like "is insignificant" or "is of little consequence" can help refine the intended nuance. It's a versatile phrase, primarily functioning to downplay the weight or influence of a subject within a particular context, often used in both scientific and journalistic settings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Is insignificant

Indicates a lower degree of impact or consequence.

Is of little consequence

Emphasizes the minimal impact or effect.

Is not a priority

Suggests something is lower on a list of important items.

Is immaterial

Indicates something is irrelevant or not pertinent.

Is not vital

Highlights the absence of critical necessity.

Is inconsequential

Points to a lack of significance or weight.

Is negligible

Suggests a very small or unimportant amount.

Is secondary

Implies something is less important than other things.

Is trivial

Indicates something is frivolous or of little value.

Is not essential

Stresses the non-critical nature of something.

FAQs

How can I use "lacks importance" in a sentence?

You can use "lacks importance" to indicate that something isn't significant or relevant. For example, "The color of the paint "lacks importance" compared to the structural integrity of the building."

What are some alternatives to "lacks importance"?

Alternatives include "is insignificant", "is of little consequence", or "is immaterial", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Which is correct: "lacks importance" or "is lacking importance"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct, but "lacks importance" is more concise. "Is lacking importance" /s/is+lacking+importance might be used for emphasis or in a more descriptive context.

How does "lacks importance" differ from "is irrelevant"?

"Lacks importance" suggests something has minimal significance within a context, while "is irrelevant" implies it's completely unrelated or inapplicable. The distinction lies in the degree of connection to the topic at hand.