lacking in amusement

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "lacking in amusement" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation, person, or thing that does not provide or evoke any amusement or entertainment. Example: "The movie was so dull that it left the audience feeling completely lacking in amusement."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Generally speaking, the Englishwoman has a suitable dress for every kind of amusement, but as far as bathing goes nothing is too slipshod, nothing too greatly lacking in taste.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Rather lacking in fizz.

Independent

Lacking alternative amusement, she went with him to check out the strange new machines.

Los Angeles Times

So writes Paul Schrader, with glorious lack of amusement, in his book Transcendental Style in Film, in which he notes "motion pictures were not born in religious practice, but instead are a totally profane offspring of capitalism and technology.

The Guardian - Film

It was as if he imagined that the limner, being shorn of words, thereby lacked amusement.

The New Yorker

DRAWBACKS Monotonous mourning dress; reputed lack of amusement.

The New York Times

The audience laughs politely — more in appreciation than in amusement.

The New Yorker

Brant looked on, shaking his head in amusement.

The New Yorker

Instead, it has found an application in amusement arcades.

The Economist

Cupid alternately participates in the dramas and watches in amusement.

The Guardian - Music

Archives|Wall Street; Too Much Faith in Amusement Park Expansion?

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider using synonyms like "devoid of amusement" or "bereft of amusement" for a more impactful or formal tone. The phrase "lacking in amusement" is correct but can sometimes sound a little bland.

Common error

Avoid stringing together multiple sentences that start with "lacking in" or other similar phrases as this can make your writing monotonous. Strive for variety in your sentence structure.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "lacking in amusement" functions primarily as an adjectival phrase. It modifies a noun to describe something or someone that does not provide or possess qualities that are entertaining or enjoyable. Since Ludwig has no examples to show, we can infer that "lacking in amusement" has very limited usage.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "lacking in amusement" is a grammatically sound adjectival phrase used to describe something that isn't entertaining. Ludwig's analysis indicates that the phrase is correct, although no examples are available. For enhanced impact or formality, alternatives such as ""devoid of amusement"" or ""bereft of amusement"" may be preferable. While suitable for general use, vary sentence structure to avoid monotony.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

devoid of amusement

Replaces "lacking in" with "devoid of", emphasizing the absence of amusement.

bereft of amusement

Uses "bereft of" to convey a sense of loss or absence of amusement.

without amusement

A simpler way to express the absence of amusement.

deficient in amusement

Substitutes "lacking" with "deficient", highlighting a shortage or inadequacy of amusement.

short on amusement

An informal way of saying there isn't enough amusement.

poor in amusement

Emphasizes the scarcity or inadequacy of amusement.

wanting in amusement

Uses "wanting" to indicate a deficiency or lack of amusement.

absence of amusement

Focuses on the absence of amusement as a state or condition.

no amusement present

Directly states that there is no amusement.

an absence of fun

Switches from "amusement" to the more common term "fun".

FAQs

What does "lacking in amusement" mean?

The phrase "lacking in amusement" means that something or someone does not provide any fun, entertainment, or enjoyment. It indicates a deficiency or absence of anything that would cause laughter or pleasure.

How can I use "lacking in amusement" in a sentence?

You can use "lacking in amusement" to describe a situation, a person's character, or an event. For example, "The lecture was so dry and factual, it was entirely lacking in amusement". Another option is: "His personality was "devoid of amusement"".

What are some alternatives to "lacking in amusement"?

Some alternatives include "devoid of amusement", "bereft of amusement", "without amusement", or simply saying something is "not fun" or "not entertaining".

Is it better to say "lacking amusement" or "lacking in amusement"?

"Lacking in amusement" is generally more common and sounds more natural in most contexts. While "lacking amusement" isn't grammatically incorrect, it's less frequently used. The phrase ""devoid of amusement"" could also be considered.