lacking credibility

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "lacking credibility" is correct and commonly used in written English.
It is used to describe something that is not believable or trustworthy. Example: The politician's promises were met with skepticism as his past actions were deemed lacking in credibility.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

37 human-written examples

Turkey dismissed the report as lacking credibility.

The New York Times

British judges have since rejected Jordanian diplomatic assurances on the matter as lacking credibility.

The Guardian

The judge dismissed the evidence of Mr Abe's two colleagues as lacking credibility.

The Economist

The trouble is that the Treasury's approach is widely seen as lacking credibility.

The Economist

It went on to denounce Mr. Greenberg as evading questions and lacking credibility as a business strategist.

The New York Times

Responses to questions by Andrew Cecil, Amazon's director of public policy, were "evasive", "unprepared" and lacking credibility.

The Guardian - Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

21 human-written examples

"It absolutely lacks credibility".

The New York Times

It lacks credibility," Bury said.

The Guardian

And the characters lacked credibility.

Independent

He also lacked credibility.

The Guardian

Besides, the opposition parties still lack credibility.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "lacking credibility", ensure the context clearly explains why something is not believable. Provide specific reasons or evidence to support your claim.

Common error

Avoid simply stating that something is "lacking credibility" without explaining why. Provide concrete details or reasons to justify your assessment and strengthen your argument.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "lacking credibility" functions as an adjective phrase that modifies a noun, indicating that something or someone does not possess the quality of being believable or trustworthy. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase is correct and commonly used.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

66%

Science

18%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "lacking credibility" is a common adjective phrase used to describe something that is not believable or trustworthy. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct and widely used across various contexts, particularly in news, science, and formal business settings. When employing this phrase, it's crucial to provide context to substantiate your claim. Alternatives like "untrustworthy" or "implausible" can be used to convey similar meanings. Remember to avoid overusing the phrase without offering supporting details to enhance clarity and strengthen your argument.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

not believable

Directly indicates a lack of believability.

untrustworthy

Focuses on the absence of trust.

unconvincing

Emphasizes the failure to persuade.

implausible

Suggests that something is hard to believe or accept.

dubious

Suggests uncertainty or suspicion.

questionable

Highlights the presence of doubt.

of dubious veracity

Highlights the uncertain truthfulness

deficient in plausibility

Emphasizes that something does not seem possible or likely.

without foundation

Indicates that an argument or claim has no basis in fact.

weak

Implies a lack of strength or soundness in an argument or evidence.

FAQs

How can I use "lacking credibility" in a sentence?

You can use "lacking credibility" to describe arguments, sources, or individuals whose claims or statements are not believable. For example: "The witness's testimony was "lacking credibility" due to inconsistencies in their story."

What are some alternatives to "lacking credibility"?

Alternatives include "untrustworthy", "not believable", or "implausible". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "lacking credibility" or "not credible"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct and convey the same meaning. "Lacking credibility" emphasizes the absence of believability, while "not credible" is a more direct negation of credibility. The choice often depends on stylistic preference.

What makes something "lacking credibility"?

Something may be "lacking credibility" if it contradicts known facts, relies on unreliable sources, contains internal inconsistencies, or is presented by someone with a history of dishonesty. Essentially, there must be reasonable grounds to doubt its truthfulness.