lacking comprehensiveness

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "lacking comprehensiveness" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe something that does not cover all necessary aspects or details, indicating that it is incomplete or insufficient in scope. Example: "The report was criticized for being lacking comprehensiveness, failing to address several key issues."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

When completely different model parameters were imposed for CuO from that of Al2O3, the model agrees well with the data; however, the model then lacks comprehensiveness because different model parameters need to be determined for different types of nanofluids.

Nanoscale Research Letters

Fourth, while the Beers' criteria may be easy to use, they lack comprehensiveness, organization, and structure.

Clinical interventions in aging

We acknowledge that not everyone will agree with this and some may argue a framework or tool without patient outcomes is incomplete and lacks comprehensiveness.

BMC Health Services Research

Although a traditional term for educating physicians in the practice environment, "managed care curriculum" is a vague terminology and lacks comprehensiveness [ 8].

BMC Medical Education

Where present, legislation often lacked comprehensiveness, for example, on basic aspects such as labeling, storage, transport, and disposal of public health pesticides.

Environmental Health Perspectives

While this approach was enormously successful in defining the basic logic of connectivity, it lacks comprehensiveness and precision: comprehensiveness because only a small fraction of the neuronal elements are used to construct the global picture; precision because integrating information across sample brains has allowed only qualitative comparisons.

Cell

For instance, guideline implementation frameworks, were essentially descriptive, based on clinical settings, were largely focussed on two domains, the innovation (the characteristics of the guideline to be implemented) and individuals, often did not include the stages of exploration and installation, and lacked comprehensiveness (degree and depth) of the evaluations element.

Health Research Policy and Systems

Data on the minimum number of such sources required for a comprehensive search strategy are probably lacking, but comprehensiveness would arguably increase with the number of supplementary sources searched.

BMC Medical Research Methodology

But the targeting categories the company serves via this feature are so broad and lacking in comprehensiveness as to be selectively uninformative and thus pretty useless at very best.

TechCrunch

[Backstory: As iOS 6 users know (and those who are on iOS 5 but have yet to change possibly because of this issue), in the latest version of Apple's mobile operating system, the company dropped Google Maps for its native mapping service in favor of a hybrid of third-party sourced and Apple-created data, which many have found to be more than lacking in comprehensiveness.].

TechCrunch

The major disadvantage of exported technology is that they are usually focused on a specific health issue and often lack comprehensiveness.

BMC Health Services Research

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use this phrase when you are evaluating the quality or the coverage/scope/extensiveness of a study. Examples include survey, scientific research, etc.

Common error

Avoid using "lacking comprehensiveness" when only a minor detail is missing. Reserve it for situations where significant aspects are overlooked, as overuse can weaken your argument.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "lacking comprehensiveness" functions as an adjective phrase modifying a noun. It describes the quality of something that is incomplete or deficient in its scope or coverage. Ludwig AI confirms its usability.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "lacking comprehensiveness" is grammatically correct and functions to describe something that is not thorough or complete in its scope. While Ludwig AI validates its usability, its limited real-world examples suggest it may not be the most common phrase choice. When using "lacking comprehensiveness", ensure it aligns with the degree of incompleteness and consider more precise alternatives like "incomplete in scope" or "deficient in detail" for nuanced communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

not comprehensive

A more direct, adjective-based alternative with similar meaning.

inadequate coverage

Highlights that the topic was not covered to the necessary or expected extent.

incomplete in scope

Focuses on the breadth of coverage, implying that the range is limited.

deficient in detail

Emphasizes the absence of specific information, suggesting a lack of thoroughness.

not thorough enough

Highlights the insufficient level of detail or effort in covering a topic.

wanting in completeness

Stresses the absence of all necessary parts or elements.

lacking in thoroughness

Emphasizes that the coverage is not sufficiently detailed or exhaustive.

superficial in treatment

Suggests the topic was handled without depth or careful consideration.

sketchy in outline

Implies that the information is vaguely presented and lacks specific details.

perfunctory approach

Suggests a routine or indifferent approach, lacking genuine depth.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "lacking comprehensiveness"?

Alternatives include "incomplete in scope", "deficient in detail", or "not thorough enough depending on what aspect you want to emphasize.

When is it appropriate to use the phrase "lacking comprehensiveness"?

Use it when something fails to cover all necessary aspects or details. This indicates that it's incomplete or insufficient in scope. Be sure that the lack of coverage is critical to your argument before using it.

Is "lacking comprehensiveness" formal or informal?

It's suitable for both formal and informal writing, although more formal settings might benefit from alternatives like "inadequate coverage" or "not comprehensive" for increased precision.

What's the difference between "lacking comprehensiveness" and "lacking detail"?

"Lacking comprehensiveness" refers to a broader scope of missing information, suggesting that key areas are not covered. "Lacking detail" indicates that specific information is missing within the areas that are covered, but the overall topic has been covered.