lack of science

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "lack of science" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation or argument that is not supported by scientific evidence or reasoning. Example: "The article's conclusions were criticized for their lack of science, as they did not reference any empirical studies."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

28 human-written examples

The science of sex - or rather the lack of science of sex.

The Guardian

Hearings on the lack of science classes have translated into all Harlem Success students having science every day.

The New York Times

It wasn't a lack of science GCSEs that stifled their dreams, it was the prejudice of the people close to them.

The Guardian

"There can be no doubt that the lack of science and mathematics specialist teachers plays a significant role in the decline in participation in A-levels in these subjects".

The Guardian

He also argues that changes in the number and types of disorders included in the various editions of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders indicate a lack of science unique to psychiatry.

The New York Times

Nurit Bar-Shai, an artist in her late 30s, said that her lack of science degrees frees her to ask "stupid questions" like "Why does an agar dish have to be flat?" So she's trying to sculpture agar "like Jell-O" to "observe bacterial colonies in 3-D".

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

32 human-written examples

This episode is horribly reminiscent of the shameful treatment of another eminent scientist, Dr David Kelly, and the lack of science-based evidence for weapons of mass destruction.

The Guardian

"These images present a snapshot of the immense scale of shark-fishing operations and show the devastation resulting from the lack of science-based management of sharks," Matt Rand, director of global shark conservation at the Pew Environment Group, said in a statement accompanying the photos and a video.

The New York Times

The lack of science-based JDC models and empirically sound JDC evaluations has limited the effectiveness of JDCs.

Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

This editorial began by highlighting the dominance of 'population health science' perspectives and the relative lack of social science perspectives in papers published in this journal Globalization and Health during its early years.

Globalization and Health

Too often the lack of social science data and the barriers of integration of social sciences with natural sciences cause important social drivers and land governance processes to be ignored in global assessment frameworks.

Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

To strengthen your argument, contrast the "lack of science" with established scientific knowledge or alternative, evidence-based approaches.

Common error

Avoid making broad generalizations about a "lack of science" without providing specific details or examples. Vague accusations undermine your credibility and weaken your argument.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "lack of science" functions as a noun phrase, often serving as the subject or object of a sentence. It identifies a deficiency or absence of scientific methodology, evidence, or understanding in a particular context. Ludwig AI confirms its usability and meaning.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

36%

Science

36%

Wiki

6%

Less common in

Formal & Business

6%

Reference

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "lack of science" is a grammatically sound and usable expression that points to the absence or deficiency of scientific principles, evidence, or methodology. Ludwig AI confirms its validity for describing situations where scientific backing is missing. While the phrase appears most frequently in news and media and scientific contexts, it maintains a neutral to formal register. When employing this phrase, provide specifics on the missing scientific elements to strengthen your argument. Alternatives such as "absence of scientific evidence" or "deficiency in scientific rigor" offer more formal options. It's important to remember to avoid overstating claims without specific scientific backup.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

absence of science

Replaces "lack" with "absence", emphasizing the non-existence of science.

paucity of scientific knowledge

Substitutes "lack" with "paucity" and specifies "scientific knowledge" for more precision.

deficiency in scientific understanding

Uses "deficiency" instead of "lack" and focuses on "scientific understanding".

scarcity of scientific evidence

Highlights the "scarcity" of "scientific evidence" supporting a claim.

insufficient scientific basis

Indicates an "insufficient scientific basis" for something.

limited scientific research

Emphasizes that there is "limited scientific research" on a particular subject.

want of scientific rigor

Employs "want" to mean lack and emphasizes the absence of "scientific rigor".

absence of empirical support

Specifies the "absence of empirical support", which is a type of scientific support.

failure to apply scientific method

Focuses on the "failure to apply scientific method" in a particular context.

non-scientific approach

Highlights the use of a "non-scientific approach" instead of a scientific one.

FAQs

How can I use "lack of science" in a sentence?

You can use "lack of science" to describe situations where scientific evidence or methodologies are absent. For instance, "The policy was criticized for its "lack of science" and reliance on anecdotal evidence."

What is a more formal way to say "lack of science"?

A more formal alternative to "lack of science" could be "absence of scientific evidence" or "deficiency in scientific rigor". These phrases convey a similar meaning but are better suited for academic or professional contexts.

Is it correct to say "absence of science" instead of "lack of science"?

Yes, "absence of science" is a valid and often interchangeable alternative to "lack of science". Both phrases indicate the non-existence or insufficiency of scientific elements.

What's the difference between "lack of science" and "lack of evidence"?

"Lack of science" generally refers to the absence of a scientific approach or understanding. "Lack of evidence", on the other hand, indicates the absence of supporting data or proof for a claim. The two terms are related, but "lack of evidence" is broader and can apply in non-scientific contexts.