Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

lack of efficacy

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"lack of efficacy" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to describe something that fails to have the desired effect, usually due to an inadequate level of quality or strength. For example, "The project was unsuccessful due to the lack of efficacy of the chosen materials."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Another 2015 review cites "inconsistent/weak evidence" for flossing and a "lack of efficacy".

News & Media

The Guardian

Aviv's article highlights the lack of efficacy of opioids in treating non-cancer chronic pain.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Dr. Okarma of Geron emphasized that the purpose of the first trial was safety, so that lack of efficacy should not be a problem.

News & Media

The New York Times

Lack of efficacy on current treatment.

Despite its creation more than 15 years ago, banner ads have been surprisingly resilient despite their lack of efficacy.

News & Media

TechCrunch

Antonaci et al. [31] reported a lack of efficacy of sumatriptan in 7 patients.

Adverse effects were minor, with only 1 patient discontinuing treatment because of lack of efficacy.

The lack of efficacy and unfavourable safety profiles contribute the most to high attrition rates.

The reasons for treatment discontinuation were lack of efficacy and side effects in an equal proportion.

One patient discontinued after reaching 3,600 mg a day due to lack of efficacy.

Recent data have demonstrated the lack of efficacy of BBA and a fierce discussion has ensued.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing research findings, clearly state the "lack of efficacy" and provide supporting data or reasons for the observed ineffectiveness.

Common error

Avoid making broad generalizations about a "lack of efficacy" based on limited data. Qualify your statements by specifying the conditions or contexts in which the ineffectiveness was observed.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "lack of efficacy" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the subject or object of a sentence. As Ludwig AI confirms, it describes the state of something not producing the desired effect. It's commonly used to express the absence of a positive outcome.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

65%

News & Media

25%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "lack of efficacy" is a noun phrase used to describe the state of something failing to produce the desired effect. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is correct and suitable for formal writing, particularly in scientific and technical contexts. It is commonly used to report the failure of a treatment or intervention to achieve its intended outcome. While alternatives such as "ineffectiveness" exist, "lack of efficacy" provides a more precise and formal way to express this concept. When using this phrase, ensure you provide supporting evidence and avoid overgeneralizations, as this will contribute to more effective communication.

FAQs

How can I use "lack of efficacy" in a sentence?

You can use "lack of efficacy" to describe situations where an intervention or treatment fails to produce the desired result. For example: "The study revealed a "lack of efficacy" of the drug in treating the condition."

What are some alternatives to "lack of efficacy"?

Alternatives include "ineffectiveness", "failure to work", or "inability to deliver results", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "lack of efficacy" or "ineffectiveness"?

Both "lack of efficacy" and "ineffectiveness" are acceptable, but "lack of efficacy" might be preferred in more formal or scientific writing. "Ineffectiveness" is generally more common in everyday language.

What does "lack of efficacy" imply in a clinical trial?

In a clinical trial, "lack of efficacy" suggests that the treatment being tested did not demonstrate a statistically significant benefit compared to a placebo or standard treatment. This can lead to the trial being stopped early or the treatment not being approved for use.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: