lack of coverage

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "lack of coverage" is correct and it can be used in written English.
For example, "The insurance company was unwilling to provide compensation due to a lack of coverage."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

So why the lack of coverage?

The Guardian - Lifestyle

A lack of coverage, he said, would have been much more damaging.

The New Yorker

It is not to do with lack of coverage," said Salisbury.

The Guardian

There is little doubt that lack of coverage was deleterious to their health.

The New York Times

Lack of coverage for breast cancer screening may play a role in delayed diagnosis, she said.

The New York Times - Health

Washington has taken note of Medicare's lack of coverage for prescription drugs.

The New York Times

Party officials blamed the national media for a lack of coverage.

The Guardian

Most of the uninsured described their lack of coverage as a profound problem.

The New York Times - Health

But the Nuggets could also use the relative lack of coverage for motivation.

The New York Times

And, no, they can't make up for that lack of coverage by going to emergency rooms.

The New York Times

He's frustrated about the lack of coverage of the fracking debate in the media.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing insurance, use "lack of coverage" to clearly indicate the absence of benefits or protection. This avoids ambiguity and ensures clarity in financial or legal contexts.

Common error

Avoid using "lack of coverage" when you actually mean "limited coverage". The former implies a complete absence of protection, while the latter suggests partial or restricted protection. Using the wrong phrase can misrepresent the situation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "lack of coverage" functions primarily as a noun phrase. It typically serves as the subject or object of a sentence or clause, denoting the absence or deficiency of protection, inclusion, or insurance. Ludwig's examples confirm its versatile usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Reference

5%

Social Media

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "lack of coverage" is a common and grammatically sound way to describe the absence or deficiency of something, especially protection or insurance. Ludwig confirms its validity and versatility through numerous examples across various domains. While generally neutral in register, it's crucial to differentiate it from "limited coverage" to avoid misrepresentation. When used correctly, "lack of coverage" effectively communicates the absence of protection or inclusion. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is correct and can be used in written English.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Absence of protection

Focuses on the absence of a protective element, differing in its emphasis on security.

Insufficient insurance

Specifically refers to inadequate insurance coverage, narrowing the scope to financial protection.

Inadequate reporting

Highlights the deficiency in reporting or media coverage, restricting the context to news and information.

Limited scope

Emphasizes the restricted extent or range of something, differing in its focus on boundaries.

Deficient safeguarding

Stresses the inadequacy of protective measures, diverging in its focus on security and prevention.

Incomplete shielding

Focuses on the partial or unfinished nature of protective measures, differing in its emphasis on protection.

Restricted access

Highlights the limited availability or permission to access something, differing in its emphasis on accessibility.

Partial exclusion

Emphasizes the incomplete or selective nature of being excluded, diverging in its focus on selectivity.

Gaps in service

Specifically refers to interruptions or deficiencies in service provision, narrowing the context to support and assistance.

Limited indemnity

Highlights restrictions on compensation or security against loss, limiting the scope to financial protection.

FAQs

How can I use "lack of coverage" in a sentence?

You can use "lack of coverage" to describe a situation where something is not adequately protected or included, for example: "The insurance claim was denied due to a "lack of coverage" for pre-existing conditions."

What's a simple way to explain "lack of coverage"?

"Lack of coverage" simply means that something isn't protected or included. In insurance, it means the policy doesn't pay for certain events or items.

What can I say instead of "lack of coverage"?

Alternatives include "absence of protection", "insufficient insurance", or "inadequate reporting" depending on the specific context.

Which is correct, "lack of coverage" or "lack of a coverage"?

"Lack of coverage" is the correct and more common phrasing. "Lack of a coverage" is grammatically awkward and less frequently used.