lack of cost

USAGE SUMMARY

"lack of cost" is a perfectly correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to refer to a situation in which there is no (or a minimal) cost or expense involved. For example: "The company was able to launch its new product due to the lack of cost associated with the project."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

42 human-written examples

Then I criticized the lack of cost control.

The New York Times

The effects of the lack of cost controls in the American system for decades can't be undone overnight.

The Guardian - Opinion

And increases in tuition are often driven more by financial problems affecting states than by a lack of cost controls at universities, they added.

The New York Times

The industrial scale production or biorefining of fermentable sugars and aromatics from plant biomass is currently limited by the lack of cost effective and efficient biocatalysts.

Current Opinion in Chemical Biology

The lack of cost and outcome information also prevents the forces of competition from working: Hospitals and doctors are reimbursed for performing lots of procedures and tests regardless of whether they are necessary to make their patients get better.

The New York Times

Despite the low actual value of most requested items, the corresponding lack of cost offers arbitrage opportunities.Babbage may have been asked a few days ago for gimcrack goods, but last year Sergey's doppelgänger raised the stakes.

The Economist

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

18 human-written examples

A barrier to remediation is the lack of cost-effective approaches to assessment.

Geoderma

The main obstacle to wide application of small bioactive peptides is a lack of cost-effective methods for mass production.

Agricultural Sciences in China

There is a lack of cost-efficient but precise measurement methods to determine φ of randomly distributed long-carbon-fiber-reinforced materials.

Composites Part B: Engineering

In such environments, the demand for M2M communications is potentially large, yet it is challenged by the lack of cost-effective service providers.

Acta Astronautica

However, wide use of 3D metrology of miniature parts is difficult due to the lack of cost-effective and precise probing system at the micro-scale.

Journal of Manufacturing Processes

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When emphasizing the financial benefit of something, use "lack of cost" to clearly convey that no expense is incurred. For example, highlight the "lack of cost" as a key advantage in situations where resources are limited or budgets are tight.

Common error

Be careful not to use "lack of cost" when you actually mean "low cost". "Lack of cost" indicates that something is free, whereas "low cost" means it's inexpensive but still requires some payment. Using the wrong term can mislead your audience about the true financial implications.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "lack of cost" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the subject or object of a sentence. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically correct. It is frequently used to describe situations where something is available without any expense or financial burden.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

38%

News & Media

34%

Formal & Business

8%

Less common in

Wiki

4%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "lack of cost" is a grammatically correct and commonly used noun phrase that effectively communicates the absence of financial expenditure. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is acceptable and can be used in a variety of contexts. It is frequently found in science, news and media, and formal business settings, with authoritative sources like The New York Times and The Guardian employing it. When writing, it's important to distinguish "lack of cost" (meaning free) from "low cost" (meaning inexpensive). Using the correct term ensures clarity and prevents misinterpretation. Alternatives like "free of charge" or "at no cost" can be used depending on the specific context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

at no cost

States that something is available without incurring any expense.

free of charge

Indicates that something is provided without any payment required.

absence of expense

Focuses on the non-existence of financial outlay.

cost-free

A single word adjective for something that doesn't involve any costs.

minimal expenditure

Highlights the small amount of money spent.

no financial burden

Emphasizes the absence of financial strain or obligation.

without payment

Highlights the absence of any monetary transaction.

complimentary

Describes something offered as a courtesy, without charge.

economical alternative

Suggests a cheaper option, not necessarily free, but affordable.

budget-friendly option

Similar to economical, implying affordability within a certain budget.

FAQs

How can I use the phrase "lack of cost" in a sentence?

You can use "lack of cost" to emphasize that something doesn't require financial investment. For instance, "The project's appeal lies in its "lack of cost", making it accessible to everyone."

What's a good alternative to "lack of cost"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "free of charge", "at no cost", or "without payment" to convey a similar meaning.

Is it correct to say "due to its lack of cost"?

Yes, it is grammatically correct. The phrase "due to its "lack of cost"" effectively explains that something is happening because there are no expenses associated with it.

What is the difference between "lack of cost" and "cost-effective"?

"Lack of cost" implies that something is free, while "cost-effective" means that something provides good value for the money spent. "Cost-effective" options still involve some expense, whereas "lack of cost" indicates complete financial exemption.