kind of error

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "kind of error" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a specific type or category of mistake or fault in various contexts, such as technical writing, academic papers, or casual conversation. Example: "The system encountered a kind of error that prevented it from processing the data correctly."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

What kind of error?

The Guardian - Travel

This is the kind of error that technological utopians make.

The New Yorker

What do we mean by "some kind of error"?

The New York Times

That is the most positive kind of error recognition, because it points to opportunity.

Harvard Business Review

They said they were not going to make that kind of error in judgment again.

The New York Times

No requests will be considered after that, for any kind of error.

Stanford University

The second kind of error that occurs are errors of exclusion.

Cornell University

Putting action before thinking is the kind of error you made.

The New Yorker

The court should avoid that kind of error in the same-sex-marriage cases.

The New York Times

The Davis case offers egregious examples of this kind of error.

The New York Times

That kind of error, experts say, suggests both a lapse in the manufacturing process as well as weak quality controls.

The Washington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing a "kind of error", be as specific as possible to ensure clarity and avoid ambiguity. Instead of simply stating the error type, provide context or examples to illustrate the error.

Common error

Avoid using "kind of error" as a vague placeholder. Replace it with precise terminology or a brief description to improve understanding. For instance, specify whether it's a "syntax error", "logical error", or "calculation error".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "kind of error" functions as a qualifier, specifying a category or type to which a mistake belongs. As Ludwig AI suggests, it's a common way to classify errors, offering a general descriptor that can be further refined with specific details.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

34%

Academia

24%

Science

22%

Less common in

Formal & Business

8%

Encyclopedias

4%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "kind of error" is a versatile and frequently used expression to categorize mistakes across various contexts. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct and commonly found in news, academic, and scientific sources. While acceptable in most situations, refining the description with specific terminology (e.g., "syntax error" or "logical error") enhances clarity. Alternatives like "type of error" or "sort of error" offer slight variations in formality. Therefore, "kind of error" serves as a reliable starting point for error classification, best complemented by precise details for improved comprehension.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

type of mistake

Replaces "error" with "mistake", focusing on the action rather than the result.

sort of error

Uses "sort" instead of "kind", offering a more informal alternative.

form of error

Substitutes "kind" with "form", implying a structured classification.

nature of error

Replaces "kind" with "nature", focusing on the inherent characteristics of the error.

category of error

Uses "category" instead of "kind", emphasizing a classification system.

species of error

A more technical or formal way of saying "kind of error".

variety of error

Highlights the diversity of errors, implying multiple distinct types.

specific error

Emphasizes the particularity of the error, shifting focus from type to instance.

particular error

Similar to "specific error", highlighting individuality over categorization.

certain error

Focuses on the certainty or definiteness of the error.

FAQs

How can I use "kind of error" in a sentence?

You can use "kind of error" to categorize a mistake. For example, "The software produced a "kind of error" that prevented data processing."

What is a more formal alternative to "kind of error"?

For a more formal tone, consider using "type of error" or "form of error". These alternatives provide a similar meaning while maintaining a professional register.

What can I say instead of "kind of error" to be more specific?

To be more specific, replace "kind of error" with the exact type, such as "syntax error", "logical error", or "runtime error", depending on the situation.

Is "kind of error" interchangeable with "type of error"?

"Kind of error" and "type of error" are largely interchangeable, but "type of error" is generally considered slightly more formal. Both are acceptable in most contexts.