kind of damage

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "kind of damage" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a type or category of damage, often in a more informal context. Example: "The storm caused a kind of damage that we had never seen before, affecting both the buildings and the infrastructure."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

What kind of damage would that cause?

Stanford University

This kind of damage is completely unnecessary.

The Washington Post

Reversing that kind of damage takes time.

The New York Times

JERRY PODANY knows the kind of damage earthquakes can wreak.

The New York Times - Arts

What fearsome calamity could wreak that kind of damage?

The New York Times - Books

We need to step up the effort to protect against that kind of damage.

Yale University

You couldn't do that kind of damage with a conventional military effort".

The New York Times

Libel can only have a value if there has been some kind of damage, right?

The Guardian

But the truth is that nobody is safe from this kind of damage.

Harvard Business Review

"Bread made from scratch, with natural yeast and organic ingredients, won't do that kind of damage".

The New York Times

"Intel was just claiming a more general kind of damage, through the loss of employees' productivity".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "kind of damage", consider whether a more specific term could provide greater clarity. For example, instead of "that kind of damage", specify "structural damage" or "cosmetic damage" if appropriate.

Common error

Avoid using "kind of damage" excessively in formal or scientific writing. Opt for more precise and technical language to maintain a professional tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "kind of damage" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the object of a verb or preposition. Ludwig confirms its grammatical correctness and usability. It denotes a general category or type of harm or destruction, as exemplified in the provided contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

61%

Academia

18%

Science

13%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "kind of damage" is a versatile noun phrase used to categorize or classify damage in a general sense. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and widely used, particularly in news, academic, and scientific contexts. While "kind of damage" is suitable for many situations, more specific terms may be preferable in formal or technical writing. When choosing alternatives, consider options like "type of damage" or more descriptive terms to enhance clarity. Remember that while common, overuse of such general phrases should be avoided to maintain precision in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

type of damage

Replaces "kind" with "type", offering a synonymous and equally common alternative.

sort of damage

Substitutes "kind" with "sort", maintaining a similar level of informality and generality.

form of damage

Replaces "kind" with "form", offering a slightly more formal alternative.

nature of damage

Shifts the focus to the inherent characteristics of the damage.

extent of damage

Emphasizes the degree or scope of the damage.

degree of damage

Focuses on the severity or intensity of the damage.

level of damage

Indicates the magnitude or stage of the damage.

specific damage

Highlights the distinct and particular aspects of the damage.

particular damage

Similar to "specific damage", emphasizing the distinctness of the damage.

damage incurred

Focuses on the damage that has been sustained or suffered.

FAQs

How can I use "kind of damage" in a sentence?

You can use "kind of damage" to refer to a specific type or category of harm or destruction. For example: "The earthquake caused a "kind of damage" that will take years to repair."

What are some alternatives to "kind of damage"?

Some alternatives include "type of damage", "sort of damage", "nature of damage", or a more specific term like "structural damage" or "cosmetic damage" depending on the context.

Which is correct: "kind of damage" or "type of damage"?

Both ""kind of damage"" and "type of damage" are correct and grammatically sound. They are often interchangeable, though "type of damage" may be perceived as slightly more formal.

When is it appropriate to use "kind of damage" instead of more specific terms?

Use ""kind of damage"" when you want to refer to a general category of damage without specifying the exact nature or details. If you know the specific type of damage, it's often better to use a more precise term.