just with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "just with" can be used correctly in written English.
It is often used to describe limited or restricted access to something. For example, "The king allowed his courtiers access to the palace just with his permission."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

They're just with her.

The New York Times

"That's just with anybody.

The New York Times - Sports

"He wasn't just with them.

The New York Times

And that's just with the adults.

The New York Times

Or just with enemies of the state?

The New York Times

But now, more just with the trainers.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

And it's not just with cars.

The Economist

"It started out just with lions".

The New Yorker

Just with more rubbing.

The Guardian - Travel

"Maybe just with a gesture.

The New York Times - Books

And not just with people.

The New York Times - Style

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "just with", ensure the context clearly specifies what is being accompanied or limited.

Common error

While "just with" is acceptable, avoid overuse in formal contexts. Opt for more precise alternatives like "solely with" or "exclusively with" to maintain a professional tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "just with" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase, modifying a verb or noun to indicate a condition, limitation, or accompaniment. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage, evidenced by numerous examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Science

15%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

1%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "just with" is a versatile prepositional phrase used to express conditions, limitations, or accompaniments. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, its grammatical status is correct, and it appears frequently in various contexts, particularly in News & Media. While acceptable in most scenarios, it's advisable to consider more formal alternatives like "solely with" or "exclusively with" in academic or business writing to enhance precision. Remember to use "just with" to clearly indicate scope, but avoid overuse in favor of more sophisticated synonyms when appropriate. The numerous examples provided by Ludwig demonstrate its common usage and provide valuable context for effective writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

only with

Indicates that something is limited to the specified condition or item.

solely with

Emphasizes exclusivity to a greater extent than "just with".

simply with

Focuses on the uncomplicated nature of the accompaniment.

exclusively with

Stresses that nothing else is involved except the mentioned item.

merely with

Highlights the simplicity or insignificance of the accompanying element.

purely with

Highlights the unmixed or unadulterated nature of the accompaniment.

in conjunction with

Indicates that something is used or happens together with something else.

together with

Similar to "along with" but can imply a closer association.

along with

Suggests accompaniment in a less restrictive way.

accompanied by

Focuses on the act of one thing being present with another.

FAQs

How can I use "just with" in a sentence?

You can use "just with" to indicate a limitation or condition. For example, "The software functions "just with" the latest operating system installed".

What's an alternative to saying "just with"?

Alternatives include "only with", "solely with", or "merely with", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it grammatically correct to use "just with"?

Yes, "just with" is grammatically correct and commonly used in various contexts to indicate a limited scope or accompaniment.

When should I avoid using "just with"?

In highly formal or academic writing, consider using more precise alternatives to "just with" to enhance clarity and maintain a professional tone. For example, prefer "exclusively with" over "just with" in research papers.