just to appoint

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "just to appoint" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating a specific purpose or intention related to making an appointment or designation. Example: "We met yesterday just to appoint a new committee chair."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

The department's chief adviser for stimulus spending, Matt Rogers, says that simple changes have been made: it no longer takes three months just to appoint a financial analyst or engineer to investigate an application.

The Economist

The VA secretary has a full year just to appoint the members.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

"If they're just looking to appoint a big name then I think they're probably going down the wrong route.

BBC

Policing minister Nick Herbert added: "The police bill has just received Royal Assent, we are saving over three million hours of officer time by cutting red tape, we are driving new arrangements for forces to buy equipment and services together and converge IT, and we are just about to appoint the head of the National Crime Agency.

BBC

They just have to appoint a dummy who is a Hong Kong permanent resident to go and vote on their behalf for the representative of their choice.

Huffington Post

Their dismissal of one effective privacy commissioner just in time to appoint an unknown other, with neither of them officially giving input, is suspiciously convenient at best.

Vice

When the rectorship of Imperial College, then part of London University, became vacant in 1973, he was the obvious person to appoint, just as he was later as vice-chancellor.

The Guardian

They want a strengthened appointments commission with the power to police the composition of the Lords, and an end to the prime ministerial power to appoint just as many peers as they want.

The Guardian - Opinion

Meg Russell, the leading academic on the House of Lords, points out that David Cameron would need to appoint just over 160 new Conservative members with no peerages at all for other groups to give the government a Lords majority.

The Guardian

From now on, surely it will be impossible for a prime minister to appoint just one woman to the most powerful decision-making body in the land and say he's terribly sorry, but it's a merit thing.

The Guardian

"There's so much demand, we've had to appoint someone just to run that side of our operations.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "just to appoint" to clearly indicate that the sole reason for an action or decision is to make an appointment. This phrasing helps to emphasize the purpose behind the process.

Common error

Avoid using "just to appoint" excessively in formal writing, especially when a more sophisticated term would better suit the tone. Consider alternatives like "specifically to designate" or "expressly to name" to maintain a professional style.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "just to appoint" functions as an infinitive of purpose, clarifying the reason behind an action. As Ludwig AI confirms, it indicates the aim or intention for making an appointment. Examples show its use in contexts where the appointment serves a specific objective.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "just to appoint" serves as an infinitive of purpose, clarifying the intent behind an action related to making an appointment. As noted by Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically sound and usable. While straightforward, it might be perceived as slightly informal in certain formal contexts, where alternatives like "specifically to designate" could be more appropriate. It is mainly found in neutral contexts, particularly in news and media. Using "just to appoint" can effectively emphasize the primary purpose of an action, ensuring clarity in communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

merely to appoint

Emphasizes the simplicity or limited scope of the action, similar to "just to appoint".

simply to appoint

Highlights the straightforward nature of the appointment process.

only to appoint

Indicates that the appointment is the sole purpose or outcome.

solely for appointment

Focuses on the exclusive purpose of the action being related to an appointment.

purely to designate

Highlights the pure intent behind designating someone.

expressly to name

Emphasizes the explicit purpose of naming someone to a position.

specifically to assign

Indicates a targeted assignment as the primary goal.

precisely for selecting

Stresses the accuracy and focus in selecting someone.

particularly to nominate

Highlights that the nomination is a key reason.

just for the sake of appointing

Emphasizes that the action of appointing someone is a purpose in itself.

FAQs

How can I use "just to appoint" in a sentence?

You can use "just to appoint" to indicate that the sole purpose of an action is to make an appointment. For example: "The committee was formed "just to appoint" a new director."

What are some alternatives to "just to appoint"?

Alternatives to "just to appoint" include "merely to appoint", "simply to appoint", or "only to appoint" depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "just to appoint" in formal writing?

While grammatically correct, "just to appoint" might sound too informal for some formal contexts. Consider using more sophisticated alternatives like "specifically to designate" or "expressly to name" to maintain a professional tone.

What does "just to appoint" emphasize in a sentence?

"Just to appoint" emphasizes that the action or decision is solely for the purpose of making an appointment, highlighting the intent and purpose behind the process.