just for coverage

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "just for coverage" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to something that is done merely to ensure that all aspects are addressed or to provide a safety net. Example: "We included the additional data in the report just for coverage, to ensure we meet all requirements."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Among the policies needed are strong regulation of insurers to prevent bad behaviour, subsidies for the poor and the creation of health-insurance exchanges.But surely going only for coverage now just delays the task of cost control until later?

The Economist

Even in an opinion-driven era, breaking news draws a crowd, especially in years not divisible by four, and viewers turned to CNN not just for tornado coverage but for the Boston Marathon bombings and the exploding fertilizer plant in Texas.

The New Yorker

Premiums for the enhanced benefits would be the same as the premiums he specified in February just for basic drug coverage: $25 a month in 2002, rising to about $50 in 2009.

The New York Times

But Zenefits Co-founder Parker Conrad says that the team quickly found that startups were using the system not just for managing health coverage and payroll, but as an alternative to traditional HRIS or Human Resources Information Systems.

TechCrunch

Indications are very encouraging, with marked improvements not just in coverage rates for basic packages of interventions, but also in reduced mortality rates.

Unicef

After 25 years of providing insurance against suits for medical malpractice, the company that insured nearly 40percentt of New Jersey's doctors is shutting its doors, leaving the doctors scrambling for coverage just as other insurers are getting out of the business or cutting back.

The New York Times

Is this ham-fisted, pretentious video just a desperate cry for coverage?

Vice

A Caterpillar executive made a similar point in an e-mail message to colleagues, saying the tax changes could "drive many employers to just drop coverage for retirees altogether, and let the government foot the whole bill".

The New York Times

Democrats say Congress must provide more money just to preserve coverage for the four million children already enrolled.

The New York Times

"At the beginning of this year, we noted that as part of this new day in health care, Americans would no longer be trapped in a job just to provide coverage for their families, and would have the opportunity to pursue their dreams," the White House press secretary said in a statement.

The Economist

"They got a lot of press coverage just for the move to Las Vegas, so they generated a lot of publicity," Mr. Horn, an Atlantic City native, said in a telephone interview from his home in Tennessee.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "just for coverage" when you want to emphasize that something is included or done to ensure completeness or provide an additional layer of protection, rather than being the primary focus.

Common error

Avoid using "just for coverage" too frequently in your writing, as it can make your tone sound dismissive or suggest that certain elements are not truly important. Consider stronger verbs or more direct phrasing to convey the true value of what you're describing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "just for coverage" primarily functions as an adverbial phrase modifying a verb. It indicates the purpose or reason behind an action, specifying that it is done to ensure completeness or provide a safety net. Ludwig AI indicates the phrase is grammatically correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

20%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "just for coverage" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to denote that something is included or performed to ensure completeness or provide an additional layer of security. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English. It functions as an adverbial phrase, clarifying the intention behind an action. While it appears most often in news and media, it can also be found in scientific and business contexts, maintaining a neutral register. When using the phrase, make sure that you are not overusing it. If you are, consider alternatives like "solely for protection" or "simply for assurance" for greater impact. The phrase aims to minimize potential future damage, providing an additional benefit, and often not essential, to the process where it is incorporated.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

solely for protection

Emphasizes that the action is taken exclusively for protective reasons, highlighting the limited scope of the action.

exclusively for security

Highlights the singular focus on maintaining security, emphasizing a dedicated effort to ensure safety.

simply for assurance

Highlights the action is done to provide peace of mind or guarantee a certain outcome, suggesting a straightforward intention.

mainly for completeness

Focuses on ensuring all aspects are covered, stressing a comprehensive approach.

merely for completion

Stresses that the action is carried out only to finish a task or meet a requirement, focusing on fulfilling a basic need.

primarily for insurance

Stresses the action is mainly to mitigate potential risks or losses, focusing on the risk management aspect.

purely for backup

Indicates the action is taken as a secondary measure in case the primary one fails, underlining the contingency aspect.

only for safeguard

Focuses on the action's purpose to maintain safety or prevent harm, emphasizing the precautionary aspect.

largely for precaution

Emphasizes the action is mostly driven by a desire to prevent something negative from happening, underlining the proactive nature.

especially for contingency

Highlights the action is particularly intended for handling unexpected situations or emergencies, emphasizing readiness.

FAQs

How can I use "just for coverage" in a sentence?

You can use "just for coverage" to indicate that something is included or done mainly to ensure completeness or provide extra protection, rather than being the primary focus. For instance, "We added extra data points to the report "just for coverage", to be thorough".

What are some alternatives to "just for coverage"?

Alternatives include "solely for protection", "simply for assurance", or "merely for completion", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "only for coverage" instead of "just for coverage"?

While "only for coverage" is grammatically correct, it can sound more restrictive than "just for coverage". "Just" often implies a degree of additional or precautionary action, whereas "only" emphasizes limitation or exclusivity.

When is it appropriate to use "just for coverage" in professional writing?

It is appropriate in professional writing when you need to explain that something is being included or done primarily to meet requirements or provide an extra layer of security, rather than being a central or essential element. It helps clarify the scope and intention behind the action.