just a type of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "just a type of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something is one among many categories or classifications. Example: "A smartphone is just a type of mobile device that offers advanced features."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

17 human-written examples

This variety is not just a type of play or dazzling embellishment - it has the ability to suggest entirely different eras, different worlds of thought, belief and sensation.

The Guardian - Arts

In sum, telemedicine parity laws are really just a type of health benefit mandate.

Forbes

Rather, Bertie senses greenly, greenly-sensing being just a type of visual sensing.

SEP

Probably no role is assigned to justification because the Mohist conception of knowledge is just a type of reliable capacity.

SEP

Yet the work is not just a type of visual appearance abstracted from a physical object, or in Lewis's terms, an artistic vehicle.

SEP

What I see in market networks is not just a type of business, but a strategic capability for any organization: the ability to orchestrate networks of service in an agile, yet repeatable fashion.

Forbes

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

43 human-written examples

Fifa couldn't just ignore a type of aggression that has no place in sport.

The Guardian - Sport

It just takes a type of political legislative genius to do it".

The Guardian

He had just developed a type of slow-motion camera, and he wanted to try it out by filming Rinty.

The New Yorker

He was from Stratford-Upon-Avon. "I just recognized a type of character," Slimane told me later.

The New Yorker

To some extent, immature embryos cultured on induction medium just undergo a type of stress (hormone stress).

Nature

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "just a type of", ensure the context clearly establishes the broader category to which the subject belongs. This helps avoid ambiguity and provides a clear understanding of the classification being made.

Common error

Avoid using "just a type of" when the subject is fundamentally different or unique. Ensure the classification accurately reflects the characteristics and context of the subject.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "just a type of" functions as a qualifier used to classify something within a broader category. Ludwig's examples show its use in defining different varieties of concepts, items, or phenomena, such as different types of art, business models, or even feelings.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

32%

Wiki

12%

Less common in

Academia

9%

Formal & Business

6%

Unknown

6%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "just a type of" is a versatile qualifier used for categorization and contextualization across diverse fields, as confirmed by Ludwig. Its function is to place something within a broader framework, often emphasizing its non-uniqueness within that category. This phrase maintains a neutral register, making it appropriate for both formal and informal discourse. While commonly found in news, scientific, and wiki contexts, its adaptability makes it valuable in a wide array of communication scenarios. Ludwig AI confirms that using "just a type of" is grammatically correct, further validating its suitability for general usage.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

merely a kind of

Replaces 'type' with 'kind', offering a slightly less formal alternative with similar meaning.

simply a category of

Substitutes 'type' with 'category', emphasizing the classification aspect.

only a variety of

Uses 'variety' instead of 'type', suggesting a specific instance within a broader group.

just a form of

Replaces 'type' with 'form', implying a specific manifestation or structure.

merely an instance of

More formal and specific, highlighting a particular occurrence or example.

simply one example of

Explicitly frames the subject as one example within a larger set.

just one sort of

Uses 'sort' for 'type', which maintains a slightly informal tone.

only a class of

More formal and scientific, emphasizing a defined grouping.

merely a subset of

Indicates that the subject is a part of a larger, defined set.

simply a manifestation of

Highlights the subject as an observable form of something broader.

FAQs

How can I use "just a type of" in a sentence?

Use "just a type of" to classify something as belonging to a broader category. For example, "A poodle is "just a type of" dog."

What can I say instead of "just a type of"?

You can use alternatives like "merely a kind of", "simply a category of", or "only a variety of" depending on the context.

Is it redundant to use "just a type of"?

While "just a type of" is generally acceptable, consider whether "a type of" alone suffices. The addition of "just" often emphasizes that the item is not exceptional within its category.

What's the difference between "just a type of" and "just a kind of"?

The phrases "just a type of" and "just a kind of" are largely interchangeable. "Kind" is slightly more informal, while "type" may be preferred in more formal or technical contexts.