Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
joint responsibility for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "joint responsibility for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing shared obligations or duties among individuals or groups regarding a specific task or issue. Example: "The committee members have joint responsibility for ensuring the project's success."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Academia
Formal & Business
Encyclopedias
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
The Executive Sessions convene individuals of independent standing to take joint responsibility for rethinking and improving society's responses to an issue.
Academia
The party's joint responsibility for the economy was also seen as likely to boost Labour.
News & Media
It claimed joint responsibility for Friday's attack on the Radisson Blu hotel in Mali.
News & Media
The Fed and the Treasury have joint responsibility for oversight of the dollar.
News & Media
This bind creates a sense of helplessness, rather than a sense of joint responsibility for success.
News & Media
Al Aksa Martyrs Brigades, a violent offshoot of Yasir Arafat's Fatah faction, claimed joint responsibility for the bombing.
News & Media
Hamas accused the Palestinian Authority of collaborating with Israel in the case and bearing joint responsibility for the man's death.
News & Media
The hallmark of open-book management is employees' joint responsibility for moving the numbers in the right direction.
News & Media
Giving the Met joint responsibility for the Transport for London (TfL) camera systems would give the Met "straightforward access with an explicit purpose for crime prevention and detection".
News & Media
"Unions are developing relationships with management to take on joint responsibility for the education and training of hourly workers throughout their careers".
News & Media
To take just one example, the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 gives the lord chief justice and the lord chancellor joint responsibility for dealing with complaints against judges.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "joint responsibility for", clearly define the specific tasks or areas for which the responsibility is shared to avoid ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid vaguely assigning "joint responsibility for" without clarifying individual roles; this can lead to confusion and inaction. Ensure each party understands their specific contributions.
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "joint responsibility for" primarily functions as a noun phrase, indicating a shared duty or obligation. It specifies that multiple parties are collectively accountable for a particular task, decision, or outcome. Ludwig confirms its correctness and usability in various contexts.
Frequent in
News & Media
40%
Science
25%
Academia
15%
Less common in
Formal & Business
10%
Encyclopedias
5%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "joint responsibility for" is a common and grammatically correct way to express shared accountability across various domains. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is widely used in formal and informal contexts, including news, science, academia, and business. When using the phrase, it's important to clearly define the specific tasks or areas for which responsibility is shared to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives like "shared accountability for" or "mutual obligation concerning" can offer subtle nuances depending on the intended meaning. Always clarify individual roles to prevent overlapping responsibilities and ensure effective collaboration.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
Shared accountability for
Replaces "responsibility" with "accountability", emphasizing the aspect of being answerable for outcomes.
Collective duty regarding
Substitutes "responsibility" with "duty", highlighting the moral or legal obligation, and changes "for" to "regarding".
Mutual obligation concerning
Emphasizes the reciprocal nature of the obligation and uses "concerning" instead of "for".
Shared burden in
Replaces "responsibility" with "burden", suggesting a shared load or difficulty. Shifts focus slightly to the effort involved.
Collaborative undertaking for
Frames the responsibility as a collaborative project, which implies shared efforts and goals.
Combined liability regarding
Specifically refers to legal or financial accountability that is shared.
Pooled obligation for
Uses "pooled" to emphasize the collective nature of the obligation.
Distributed accountability concerning
Focuses on the distribution of responsibility and uses "concerning" instead of "for".
Cooperative role in
Emphasizes the cooperative aspect of the role, changing the focus from obligation to action.
Unified obligation for
Stresses the unity in the obligation, suggesting a single, cohesive responsibility.
FAQs
How can I use "joint responsibility for" in a sentence?
You can use "joint responsibility for" to indicate that two or more parties share accountability for a particular task or outcome. For example, "The management and employees have "joint responsibility for" maintaining a safe work environment".
What are some alternatives to "joint responsibility for"?
Alternatives include "shared accountability for", "collective duty regarding", or "mutual obligation concerning", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is it correct to say "joint responsibilities for"?
While grammatically acceptable, "joint responsibilities for" is less common than ""joint responsibility for"". The singular form emphasizes the overall concept of shared accountability, whereas the plural might suggest multiple, distinct shared duties.
What's the difference between "joint responsibility for" and "shared responsibility for"?
The terms ""joint responsibility for"" and "shared responsibility for" are largely synonymous and can be used interchangeably. Both indicate that multiple parties are accountable for a specific task or outcome.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested