joined forces closely with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "joined forces closely with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a collaborative effort or partnership between individuals or groups that work together in a close manner. Example: "The two organizations joined forces closely with local communities to address the pressing environmental issues."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

The political party most closely associated with Acting President Vladimir V. Putin unexpectedly joined forces with the Communists today to re-elect the Communist speaker of the Russian Parliament's lower house.

The New York Times

A1 Moscow Political Maneuvers The political party most closely associated with Acting President Vladimir V. Putin unexpectedly joined forces with the Communists to reelect the Communist speaker of the Parliament's lower house.

The New York Times

AETMIS joined forces with them and helped come up with an integrated and concerted solution.

Health Research Policy and Systems

He also joined forces with Hedayat Films, an Iranian company that makes about 60 feature films a year, and worked closely with Majid Mirfakhraei, a leading Iranian art director and designer.

The New York Times

The veterans joined forces with their former enemies, including the group Afghans for Peace, who said their missions are closely aligned--to end.

Huffington Post

We recently joined forces with Caffè Nero.

The Guardian

Some competitors have joined forces with newspapers.

The New York Times

Fulani joined forces with Nicholas Sabatine III and created the National Patriot Party.

The New Yorker

Nawaz Sharif, her erstwhile rival, joined forces with her in opposition.

The Economist

Retreating, Warwick joined forces with York's son Edward.

Encyclopedia Britannica

They've also joined forces with their newspapers.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "joined forces closely with" in formal writing. Opt for more standard and grammatically sound alternatives such as "collaborated closely with" or "partnered with closely".

Common error

The phrase "joined forces closely with" is often redundant. "Joined forces" already implies a close collaboration. Adding "closely with" can make the sentence sound awkward and unnatural. Consider using only "joined forces with" for a more concise and clearer sentence.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "joined forces closely with" aims to describe a collaborative action. However, it's considered redundant because "joined forces" already implies a close association. Thus, its function is weakened by the unnecessary addition of "closely with". Ludwig AI confirms a preference against it.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "joined forces closely with" is considered grammatically questionable due to its redundancy. While the intent is to emphasize close collaboration, the addition of "closely with" is unnecessary and stylistically awkward. Ludwig AI's analysis, combined with the absence of real-world examples in authoritative sources, suggests that it is best to opt for more concise and standard alternatives such as "joined forces with", "collaborated closely with", or "partnered closely with". By avoiding this phrase, you can ensure clearer and more effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Collaborated closely with

Replaces "joined forces" with "collaborated", emphasizing cooperative effort while retaining the "closely with" modifier.

Partnered closely with

Substitutes "joined forces" with "partnered", highlighting a formal agreement or alliance, while maintaining the emphasis on a close relationship.

Worked in close collaboration with

Rephrases the entire expression to emphasize the collaborative aspect and the tight-knit nature of the working relationship.

Allied closely with

Uses "allied" to suggest a strategic alliance, keeping the closeness emphasized.

Teamed up closely with

Replaces "joined forces" with "teamed up", indicating a cooperative effort towards a common goal, emphasizing the tight connection.

Associated closely with

Uses "associated" to denote a connection or relationship, with "closely" emphasizing the depth of the association.

United closely with

Implies a merging of efforts or resources, keeping the close connection.

Cooperated closely with

Highlights the act of working together, while "closely" underscores the manner in which they cooperated.

Combined efforts closely with

Emphasizes the merging of resources and actions, with "closely" modifying how they combined.

Joined forces with

Removes the adverb "closely" which makes the sentence grammatically correct and more natural.

FAQs

Is "joined forces closely with" grammatically correct?

While the individual words are correct, the phrase "joined forces closely with" is considered redundant and stylistically awkward. It's better to use either "joined forces with" or a phrase like "collaborated closely with".

What can I say instead of "joined forces closely with"?

You can use alternatives like "collaborated closely with", "partnered closely with", or simply "joined forces with", depending on the context.

Which is correct, "joined forces closely with" or "joined forces with"?

"Joined forces with" is the preferred and more grammatically sound option. Adding "closely with" is usually unnecessary and can make the sentence wordy.

What's the difference between "joined forces with" and "collaborated with"?

"Joined forces with" generally implies a more active and unified effort, while "collaborated with" suggests a more cooperative but potentially less integrated approach. The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.