Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

collaborated with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"collaborated with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase whenever you want to indicate that two people or groups worked together on a joint project. For example, "The two teams collaborated with each other to create a new product."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

She also collaborated with Manolo Blahnik.

News & Media

The New York Times

He collaborated with you on the Centurion.

News & Media

The New York Times

"They collaborated with their actors.

News & Media

The Guardian

"I've collaborated with great players.

News & Media

The New York Times

Sagan collaborated with four scientists.

News & Media

The New Yorker

He has collaborated with Fr.

Some villagers had collaborated with the guerrillas.

News & Media

The New York Times

You've collaborated with some huge artists (5).

Q. You've also collaborated with Taylor Swift.

"Those people collaborated with a vile regime".

News & Media

The New York Times

In 2000, Brion collaborated with David Byrne.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "collaborated with", ensure the context clearly defines the nature and scope of the collaboration. Provide specific details about the project or goal that was achieved through the partnership to give the reader a clearer understanding.

Common error

Avoid using "collaborated with" in a way that obscures who initiated or benefited most from the collaboration. Clearly state the roles and contributions of each party to avoid ambiguity.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "collaborated with" functions as a prepositional phrase indicating a cooperative effort or partnership between two or more entities. It connects a subject with another party involved in a shared activity. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is correct and widely used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Academia

27%

Science

23%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "collaborated with" is a common and grammatically correct way to describe a cooperative effort between two or more parties. As Ludwig AI confirms, its usage is well-established and versatile. It's frequently found in news, academic, and scientific contexts, indicating its suitability for various levels of formality. When using this phrase, it is important to provide specific details about the collaboration to provide clarity. Alternatives such as "partnered with" or "worked alongside" can be used to add nuance, but "collaborated with" remains a solid and reliable choice for general use.

FAQs

How can I use "collaborated with" in a sentence?

You can use "collaborated with" to indicate that two or more parties worked together on a project or endeavor. For example, "The artist "collaborated with" a musician on the soundtrack."

What are some alternatives to "collaborated with"?

Some alternatives include "partnered with", "worked alongside", and "cooperated with". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nature of the collaboration.

Is it redundant to say "collaborated together with"?

Yes, using "together" with "collaborated" is generally considered redundant. The word "collaborate" already implies working together, so "collaborated with" is sufficient.

What's the difference between "collaborated with" and "assisted"?

"Collaborated with" implies a more equal partnership and shared creation, while "assisted" suggests a supporting role where one party helps another.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: