job cuts

USAGE SUMMARY

"job cuts" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe a reduction in the number of positions a company is offering, usually due to budget constraints or a change in the company's focus. For example, "The company announced significant job cuts in its marketing department."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

So, no job cuts.

The New York Times

Job cuts are needed.

The Economist

Public-sector job cuts?

The Economist

Job cuts are also expected.

The Economist

Job cuts have already begun.

The New York Times

This will mean job cuts.

The Guardian

No job cuts are planned.

The New York Times

For now, job cuts continue.

The New York Times

Massive job cuts are forecast.

The Guardian - Opinion

This could include job cuts.

The New York Times

Late last year, GM announced big job cuts.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When reporting on "job cuts", provide context regarding the reasons behind them, such as economic downturns, restructuring, or technological advancements. This adds depth and clarity to the information.

Common error

While "job cuts" can be a sensitive topic, it's important to avoid using overly dramatic language or speculation without factual basis. Stick to reporting the facts and avoid exaggerating the impact.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "job cuts" functions primarily as a noun phrase. It typically acts as the subject or object of a sentence, referring to the act or instance of reducing the number of jobs within an organization. Ludwig AI indicates the phrase is correctly and widely used in business and news contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Formal & Business

20%

Science

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

1%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "job cuts" is a very common noun phrase used to describe the reduction of employment positions, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. It is grammatically correct and predominantly found in news and business contexts, serving the purpose of reporting on or discussing workforce reductions. While the term itself is neutral, understanding the underlying reasons and avoiding sensationalism is crucial when using it in writing. Alternative phrases such as "workforce reduction" or "layoffs" can be used depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

workforce reduction

Focuses on the overall size of the workforce being decreased.

staff layoffs

Highlights the act of laying off staff members.

downsizing the company

Implies a reduction in the company's size or scale.

personnel reduction

Similar to workforce reduction, but emphasizes the number of personnel.

reducing headcount

Focuses on decreasing the number of employees.

trimming the workforce

Suggests a more targeted or strategic reduction in the workforce.

streamlining staff

Implies making the staff more efficient, often through reductions.

reducing employee numbers

A direct and straightforward way to describe decreasing the number of employees.

eliminating positions

Highlights the removal of specific job roles within a company.

implementing redundancies

Focuses on making roles redundant or unnecessary.

FAQs

How to use "job cuts" in a sentence?

You can use "job cuts" to describe a situation where a company reduces its workforce, such as "The company announced significant "job cuts" due to declining profits."

What can I say instead of "job cuts"?

You can use alternatives like "workforce reduction", "layoffs", or "downsizing depending on the context.

Which is correct, "job cuts" or "jobs cut"?

"Job cuts" is the more common and grammatically correct phrase. "Jobs cut" could be used, but ""job cuts"" is the standard terminology.

What's the difference between "job cuts" and "restructuring"?

"Job cuts" specifically refers to the reduction of positions within a company, while "restructuring" is a broader term that describes significant changes to a company's operations, which may or may not include "job cuts".