jeopardize the integrity of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "jeopardize the integrity of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing actions or situations that may harm or compromise the quality, reliability, or wholeness of something. Example: "The new policy could jeopardize the integrity of our data security measures."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

21 human-written examples

But critics have complained that such financial relationships jeopardize the integrity of scientific research.

The New York Times

"We will provide anything as long as it's legal and doesn't jeopardize the integrity of our company and the companies we work for," he said.

The New York Times

As a matter of corporate policy, we don't condone or support any activities that could potentially jeopardize the integrity of any best-seller list.

The New York Times

"If we are perceived as being pro-development or anti-development for whatever reason, it will jeopardize the integrity of the memorandum of agreement," said Christopher O.

The New York Times

In addition, the firm said, "We are convinced that disclosing additional findings from our continued investigation now could jeopardize the integrity of the government's criminal investigation".

The New York Times - Sports

Also last month, Jennifer Brunner, the Ohio secretary of state, released a report in the wake of the Cuyahoga crashes arguing that touch-screens "may jeopardize the integrity of the voting process".

The New York Times - Magazine

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

35 human-written examples

But yesterday, Mr. Spitzer singled out Merrill, saying the firm's behavior "jeopardizes the integrity of the marketplace".

The New York Times

"She's jeopardizing the integrity of the investigation and hampering working relationships with other law enforcement departments," said Mr. Castro, a former Bronx assistant district attorney.

The New York Times

"In this case, Coach Petrino abused his authority when he made a staff hire that benefited himself and jeopardized the integrity of the football program," Long said.

The New York Times - Sports

Last week, a group of curators and scholars at the Museum of American History accused Mr. Small of jeopardizing the integrity of the institution and breaching standard museum practices because of agreements reached with multimillion-dollar donors.

The New York Times

The most daunting challenge of Merkel's time in office has been the euro-zone crisis, which threatened to bring down economies across southern Europe and jeopardized the integrity of the euro.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "jeopardize the integrity of", ensure that the subject of the sentence clearly identifies what is at risk of being compromised. For example, specify whether it's the "integrity of data", "integrity of a system", or "integrity of a process".

Common error

While "jeopardize the integrity of" is appropriate in many contexts, overuse can make your writing sound repetitive. Vary your language by using synonyms like "compromise", "threaten", or "undermine" to maintain reader engagement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "jeopardize the integrity of" functions as a verb phrase that introduces a potential negative consequence. It highlights actions or situations that may harm or compromise the reliability, soundness, or completeness of something. As Ludwig AI confirms, this is correct and widely used.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

45%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "jeopardize the integrity of" is a grammatically correct and useful expression for indicating a risk to the soundness or reliability of something. While Ludwig AI confirms its validity, varying your language with synonyms such as "compromise", "threaten", or "undermine" can enhance your writing. The phrase is most commonly found in news and scientific contexts, suggesting a formal tone. Understanding its function and purpose helps ensure its effective and impactful use in various written communications.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

compromise the integrity of

Uses a different verb with a very similar meaning to "jeopardize".

threaten the integrity of

Employs a different verb suggesting a potential risk to integrity.

endanger the integrity of

Replaces "jeopardize" with a synonym implying a greater level of risk.

undermine the integrity of

Suggests a gradual weakening, rather than a sudden threat.

impair the integrity of

Indicates a reduction in the quality or effectiveness of the integrity.

weaken the integrity of

Implies making the integrity less strong or secure.

damage the integrity of

Suggests causing harm or impairment to the integrity.

erode the integrity of

Suggests a gradual degradation or wearing away of the integrity.

jeopardize the reliability of

Substitutes "integrity" with "reliability", focusing on dependability.

jeopardize the safety of

Replaces "integrity" with "safety", shifting the focus to security.

FAQs

How can I use "jeopardize the integrity of" in a sentence?

You can use "jeopardize the integrity of" to describe actions or situations that could damage or compromise something's reliability or wholeness. For example: "The lack of security protocols could "jeopardize the integrity of" the system".

What are some alternatives to "jeopardize the integrity of"?

Alternatives include "compromise the integrity of", "threaten the integrity of", or "undermine the integrity of", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "jeopardize the integrity of" or "compromise the integrity of"?

Both "jeopardize the integrity of" and "compromise the integrity of" are correct and widely used. "Compromise" might suggest a more significant or complete loss of integrity, while "jeopardize" suggests a risk of loss. Ultimately, the best choice depends on the specific context.

What's the difference between "jeopardize the integrity of" and "threaten the integrity of"?

"Jeopardize the integrity of" suggests putting something at risk, while "threaten the integrity of" indicates a more direct or imminent danger. Both phrases imply a potential negative impact on the integrity of something, but the level of risk or immediacy differs.