it would prejudice

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it would prejudice" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing a situation where an action or decision may negatively affect someone's rights, interests, or a fair outcome. Example: "If we proceed with this plan, it would prejudice the ongoing negotiations with the other party."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

16 human-written examples

In March 2014, a fact-finding judgement on the circumstances of Poppi's death was delivered but its publication was delayed for fear it would prejudice criminal proceedings.

Independent

I certify that it would prejudice the national interest to disclose the particular facts concerning these surveillances other than to the court in camera.

Cornell University

Ms. Olson's defense lawyers had sought to exclude any mention of the word "terrorist" in the trial out of concerns that it would prejudice the jury.

The New York Times

The British ambassador, Christopher Meyer, asserts in a June 4 letter that the British government cannot accept a call for public inquiries because it would prejudice criminal investigations.

The New York Times

Last week, the High Court rejected their appeal to prevent the early deposition of Mr. Talansky altogether on grounds that it would prejudice the case.

The New York Times

The Home Office refused my FoI request to hand over large parts of these crucial reports and censored data on the number of failures because it would "prejudice the commercial interests" of major corporations such as Serco.

The Guardian - Opinion

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

44 human-written examples

He added: "This information is, however, being withheld to safeguard national security, because its release would prejudice the defence of the UK, and because it relates to the formulation of government policy".

The Guardian

Forcing it to face trial with Visa would prejudice and confuse a jury, the papers said.

The New York Times

The trust wants to keep the report secret, claiming that revealing the details of what happened would prejudice its ability to carry out similar investigations in the future.

Independent

International consensus has been that Jerusalem's status should be settled in a peace deal and recognising it as a capital for either side would prejudice one party over the other.

The Guardian

"It would be very improper" if Bonds were suspended, Moss said, "because he would prejudice the legal proceeding.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "it would prejudice", consider whether a more specific term like "bias", "harm", or "compromise" might be more appropriate to the context.

Common error

While grammatically correct, "it would prejudice" can sound overly formal in casual conversation. Opt for simpler alternatives like "it would hurt" or "it would be unfair" to maintain a natural tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it would prejudice" functions as a conditional clause expressing a potential negative consequence. It is used to indicate that a specific action or event could lead to an unfair or unfavorable outcome, influencing judgments or decisions. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Academia

22%

Wiki

16%

Less common in

Science

7%

Encyclopedias

5%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "it would prejudice" is a grammatically correct and commonly used conditional clause that suggests a potential negative influence or unfair outcome. According to Ludwig AI, it is suitable for formal contexts, particularly in legal, academic, and news reporting. While the phrase is widely accepted, considering alternatives like "it would harm" or "it would bias" can enhance clarity and appropriateness depending on the specific situation. While typically neutral or formal, avoiding overuse in casual speech will help maintain a natural conversational tone.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it would bias

Replaces "prejudice" with "bias", focusing on influencing unfairly.

it would disadvantage

Focuses on creating an unfair or unfavorable situation.

it would compromise

Emphasizes the potential to weaken or impair something.

it would undermine

Highlights the act of weakening support or effectiveness.

it would jeopardize

Highlights the risk or threat to something important.

it would harm

A more direct and general term for causing damage or negative impact.

it would be detrimental to

Uses a more formal tone to indicate harm or damage.

it would imperil

Similar to "jeopardize" but suggests a more severe danger.

it would negatively impact

Emphasizes the adverse effects of a particular action.

it would unfavorably influence

Focuses on affecting outcomes in a negative or undesirable way.

FAQs

What does "it would prejudice" mean?

The phrase "it would prejudice" means that something would negatively affect someone's rights, interests, or a fair outcome. It implies creating a bias or disadvantage.

How can I use "it would prejudice" in a sentence?

You can use "it would prejudice" to express a potential negative impact. For example, "Releasing this information now "it would prejudice" the ongoing investigation."

What can I say instead of "it would prejudice"?

Alternatives to "it would prejudice" include phrases like "it would harm", "it would bias", or "it would compromise", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is "it would prejudice" formal language?

Yes, "it would prejudice" is generally considered formal language. In more casual contexts, simpler alternatives might be more appropriate.