it would eradicate

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it would eradicate" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the potential elimination or removal of something, often in a hypothetical or future context. Example: "If implemented effectively, this policy would eradicate poverty in our community."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

7 human-written examples

What kinds of problems we hope it would eradicate, what its advantages are compared to other methods, and how it relates to traditional methods of moral betterment.

BMC Medical Ethics

Then in 1998, the Bolivian government announced it would eradicate coca farms through a military program financed by the Americans.

The New York Times

The best opportunity probably existed in 1955, the year Mr. Gates was born and the year the W.H.O. said it would eradicate malaria.

The New York Times - Health

But the W.H.O., a United Nations agency based in Geneva, said it still believed that it would eradicate polio, though it might take longer than had been expected.

The New York Times

"It would eradicate the decisions that referees are getting wrong that affect games".

BBC

But she's not convinced that's possible, or that it would eradicate unethical use.

Vice

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

52 human-written examples

Its rationale would eradicate them.

The Guardian

Tutton 28 describes how the development of laboratory sciences was contested by physicians of the time, who feared that its progression would eradicate patient individuality.

BMJ Open

Adam Smith and Thomas Malthus debated whether the emerging market economy would eradicate hunger or depended on it, but both agreed that the market should be left to produce plenty or want without intervention from the state.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Instead, believers said, the church needed to be a vehicle to push for fundamental political and structural changes that would eradicate poverty, even – some believed – if it meant supporting armed struggle against oppressors.

The Guardian

This observation is significant because it rules out sexual reproduction (or selfing with recombination), given that Mendelian segregation would eradicate this high level of genotypic similarity within a single generation.

eLife

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "it would eradicate", ensure the subject clearly identifies what is being eliminated, and the context supports a sense of complete removal or destruction. For example, "Implementing stricter regulations it would eradicate corruption within the industry" provides a clear subject and action.

Common error

Avoid using "it would eradicate" when the context suggests only a reduction or control, not complete elimination. Using "it would mitigate" or "it would reduce" might be more accurate if total eradication is not feasible.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it would eradicate" functions as a modal verb phrase, expressing a hypothetical or conditional future action. As seen in the Ludwig examples, this phrase is used to suggest that something, if implemented or achieved, would completely remove or eliminate a specific problem or issue.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

43%

Science

43%

Formal & Business

14%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "it would eradicate" is a modal verb phrase used to express a hypothetical or conditional future action that results in the complete removal or elimination of something. Ludwig AI indicates that this phrase is grammatically correct and usable in written English. While relatively uncommon, the phrase appears in various contexts, including news media and scientific publications, suggesting a neutral to professional register. Related phrases include "it would eliminate" and "it would remove". When using this phrase, ensure that the subject is clear and the context supports a sense of complete removal, avoiding overstatements where a reduction or control is more accurate.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it would eliminate

Replaces "eradicate" with "eliminate", offering a direct synonym with a slightly less forceful connotation.

it would remove

Substitutes "eradicate" with "remove", suggesting a broader sense of taking something away, not necessarily completely.

it would abolish

Replaces "eradicate" with "abolish", implying a formal or systemic removal, typically used for laws or practices.

it would obliterate

Employs "obliterate" instead of "eradicate", conveying a more destructive and complete removal.

it would extinguish

Uses "extinguish" in place of "eradicate", suggesting the bringing to an end of something, such as a fire or a hope.

it would suppress

Replaces "eradicate" with "suppress", indicating the act of inhibiting or restraining something rather than complete removal.

it would prevent

Substitutes "eradicate" with "prevent", shifting the focus from removing something existing to stopping something from happening.

it would halt

Employs "halt" instead of "eradicate", suggesting a stop or pause to something rather than complete removal.

it would curtail

Replaces "eradicate" with "curtail", indicating a reduction or restriction rather than complete elimination.

it would negate

Substitutes "eradicate" with "negate", suggesting to make something ineffective.

FAQs

How can I use "it would eradicate" in a sentence?

Use "it would eradicate" to describe a scenario where something completely eliminates a problem or issue. For example, "The new policy "it would eradicate" instances of fraud".

What are some alternatives to "it would eradicate"?

Alternatives include phrases like "it would eliminate", "it would remove", or "it would abolish", depending on the specific context and the degree of removal you want to express.

Is "it will eradicate" the same as "it would eradicate"?

"It will eradicate" implies a future certainty, while "it would eradicate" expresses a hypothetical or conditional outcome. The choice depends on whether you're stating a fact or a possibility.

What's the difference between "it would eradicate" and "it would mitigate"?

"It would eradicate" implies complete removal, while "it would mitigate" suggests reducing the severity or impact of something. Use "eradicate" when complete elimination is the goal, and "mitigate" when managing or lessening the effects is more realistic.