it would be substantial

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it would be substantial" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the significance or importance of something in a hypothetical context. Example: "If we secure this funding, it would be substantial for our research project."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

6 human-written examples

"I don't think it would be substantial as the economy is rebounding," he told a news conference in Tokyo.

The New York Times

For example, it would be substantial evidence against current seismological theories if most earthquakes in the next five years were not in the Pacific Ring of Fire.

The New York Times

No one knows how much oil and gas there might be in these provinces, but based on geological estimates it would be substantial.

The New York Times

Watson said he didn't know the size of the potential compensation payout should the action be successful but said it would be substantial.

The Guardian

Frank D. Vasta, a Rockrose vice president, said yesterday that he had not calculated the cost of keeping the pile driver and other heavy equipment idle, but he said it would be substantial.

The New York Times

It is not impossible that UKIP could win here, but if they take 30% of the vote it would be substantial progress for them as they try to establish themselves as the main opposition to Labour in the North of England.

BBC

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

So, again, assuming that we're talking about pre-specified changes, I think it would - there would be substantial ethical issues if we told the patients we're going to put you in the trial, and we may change the eligibility criteria; we may change the outcome criteria; we may change everything; we have no idea where we're going with this.

BMC Medical Ethics

"That would be a tragedy at a human level and the knock-on impact on other services such as health and social care would be substantial," it said.

The Guardian

He said he did not know much about what Mitt Romney would do as president, but judging from the budget that Mr. Romney's running mate, Representative Paul D. Ryan, had proposed as chairman of the House Budget Committee, it seemed likely that there would be substantial cuts in spending including at the National Institutes of Health.

The New York Times

The more the companies weaken, however, the less likely investors are to step up and the more likely it is that any government intervention would be substantial.

The New York Times

However, we preferred to purposely select facilities where it was known that PAC caseloads would be substantial and where there would be respondents well versed in the details of post-abortion treatments.

Health Policy and Planning

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "it would be substantial" to emphasize the significance or considerable impact of a potential outcome or action. This phrase is suitable for both formal and informal contexts where you want to convey importance.

Common error

While grammatically correct, avoid overusing "it would be substantial" in very casual conversations. Simpler alternatives like "it would be a big deal" might be more appropriate for informal settings.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it would be substantial" functions as a predicative adjective phrase, expressing a hypothetical degree or extent of something. Ludwig AI's examples show its usage to qualify impact or amount.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

35%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "it would be substantial" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression to convey that something would be significant, considerable, or impactful. As Ludwig AI confirms, its usage spans various contexts, including News & Media, Science, and Formal & Business settings, with a neutral to professional tone. While versatile, be mindful of overuse in informal settings. Alternatives like "it would be significant" or "it would be important" can offer similar meanings with slightly different nuances. The phrase functions as a predicative adjective phrase, forecasting consequences and qualifying impact or amount.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it would be significant

Replaces "substantial" with "significant", implying importance and impact.

it would be considerable

Replaces "substantial" with "considerable", suggesting a noteworthy amount or degree.

it would be meaningful

Replaces "substantial" with "meaningful", indicating importance and purpose.

it would be appreciable

Replaces "substantial" with "appreciable", emphasizing a noticeable or measurable impact.

it would be sizable

Replaces "substantial" with "sizable", highlighting the large size or scale.

it would be marked

Replaces "substantial" with "marked", suggesting a noticeable and distinct change or effect.

it would be material

Replaces "substantial" with "material", indicating relevance and importance.

it would be large

Uses a simpler term "large" instead of "substantial", referring to a great size or extent.

it would be important

Replaces "substantial" with "important", focusing on the significance of something.

it would be major

Replaces "substantial" with "major", highlighting the significant and impactful nature of something.

FAQs

How can I use "it would be substantial" in a sentence?

Use "it would be substantial" to indicate that something would have a significant impact or be of considerable size or importance. For example, "If we secure this grant, "it would be substantial" for our project's progress".

What are some alternatives to "it would be substantial"?

You can use alternatives like "it would be significant", "it would be considerable", or "it would be important" depending on the context.

Is "it would be substantial" formal or informal?

"It would be substantial" is generally considered neutral to formal. It's appropriate for business, academic, and news contexts, but might sound slightly out of place in very casual conversation. Consider using a more informal phrase like "it would be a big deal" in casual settings.

What's the difference between "it would be substantial" and "it would be significant"?

While both phrases convey importance, "it would be substantial" often implies a considerable amount or size, whereas "it would be significant" emphasizes the importance or impact. They are often interchangeable, but consider the specific nuance you wish to convey.