Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
it would be more shocking
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "it would be more shocking" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing a situation or event that would elicit surprise or disbelief if it were to occur. Example: "If the company decided to cut salaries instead of giving raises, it would be more shocking than any of us could have imagined."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
3 human-written examples
It would be more shocking if they did.
News & Media
In fact, it would be more shocking if he did not contend.
News & Media
She says: "I think it would be more shocking to have an identity that is completely anonymous, then all of a sudden have people recognise you and feel a sense of pressure that I never experienced because this is all I can remember".
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
56 human-written examples
"Who should be the next captain has been on my mind for a while - we'd been working on a new leadership group over the past year to make sure that when the day did come, it would be more of a natural progression than a shock to the system," he added.
News & Media
It would be more respectable.
News & Media
The truth of the matter is, given the political makeup of the state - and the obstacles Ms. Whitman and Ms. Fiorina have in winning here - it would been more of a shock if the two took the stage with Ms. Palin and Mr. Steele, who himself is something if an embattled figure in his own party.
News & Media
And when you have considered this, consider the following question: if you were that medieval visitor, would you be more shocked by the fat children?
News & Media
Or would you be more shocked by the society that only identified them as such if they were also working class?
News & Media
I would have been more shocked had I'd still been there [when the Rocky was closed]." "Writing the book, and even now, I still have wild dreams about my working at the Rocky," he said.
News & Media
"I would be more than shocked if they were involved".
News & Media
The sight of Grainger on the top step of the podium in Sunday's BBC Sports Personality of the Year awards would be more seismic shock than mere surprise, but the outsider makes all the right noises about just making the shortlist.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using this phrase, consider the audience and context. It can be used in both formal and informal settings, but ensure the level of surprise conveyed is appropriate for the situation.
Common error
Avoid overuse of "it would be more shocking", as it can lose its impact. Vary your language by using synonyms like "surprising", "astonishing", or "unexpected" to keep your writing engaging and precise.
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "it would be more shocking" functions as a hypothetical statement expressing a higher degree of surprise or disbelief in comparison to an alternative scenario. It relies on the conditional "would" to convey this hypothetical nature. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically correct and usable.
Frequent in
News & Media
66%
Science
17%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "it would be more shocking" is a grammatically sound and usable expression to convey surprise or disbelief, as affirmed by Ludwig AI. It's most commonly found in news and media contexts. While versatile, writers should be mindful of overuse and consider synonymous alternatives to maintain engagement and clarity. This phrase serves to emphasize how much more surprising one thing is over another.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
it would be even more surprising
Replaces "shocking" with "surprising", emphasizing the unexpected nature of the event.
it would be utterly astonishing
Substitutes "shocking" with "astonishing", conveying a stronger sense of amazement.
it would be quite unexpected
Replaces "shocking" with "unexpected", focusing on the lack of anticipation.
it would be highly improbable
Shifts the focus to the low likelihood of the event occurring.
it would defy belief
Implies that the event would be so surprising as to be hard to accept.
it would be beyond comprehension
Suggests the event would be so unusual as to be difficult to understand.
it would be nothing short of a miracle
Emphasizes the extremely unlikely and fortunate nature of the event.
it would raise eyebrows
Focuses on the social reaction to the surprising event.
it would turn heads
Highlights the attention-grabbing aspect of the event.
it would be a bolt from the blue
Uses a metaphor to describe the sudden and unexpected nature of the event.
FAQs
How can I use "it would be more shocking" in a sentence?
You can use "it would be more shocking" to describe an event or situation that would cause significant surprise or disbelief. For example, "If the company decided to cut salaries instead of giving raises, "it would be more shocking" than any of us could have imagined".
What can I say instead of "it would be more shocking"?
You can use alternatives like "it would be more surprising", "it would be more startling", or "it would be quite unexpected" depending on the context.
Is "it would be more shocking" formal or informal?
"It would be more shocking" can be used in both formal and informal contexts, depending on the audience and the level of surprise you want to convey. Consider the specific situation to determine if a more or less emphatic phrase is appropriate.
What's the difference between "it would be more shocking" and "it would be more surprising"?
While both phrases express a sense of unexpectedness, "it would be more shocking" implies a greater degree of surprise or disbelief than "it would be more surprising". "Shocking" suggests a more significant deviation from expectations.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested