it would be equal to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it would be equal to" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when making comparisons or explaining equivalences between two values or concepts. Example: "In this equation, the total cost would be equal to the sum of the individual prices."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

10 human-written examples

If it doubled again by 2010, it would be equal to Italy's.

The Economist

It would be equal to Bernie Grant walking into parliament in full, bright Ghanaian robes, Zadie Smith publishing White Teeth or Mishal Husain becoming a presenter on the Today programme.

The Guardian - Opinion

At Johns Hopkins alone, it would be equal to about one cancer patient a week with a wrong diagnosis, and across the country could add up to a conservative estimate of 30,000 mistakes a year.

The New York Times - Health

Umenyiora, one of the plaintiffs in the Brady v. N.F.L. case, said in the affidavit that Reese agreed in an April 2008 meeting to renegotiate his contract before last season so it would be equal to the current top five defensive ends, or to trade him, if Umenyiora was "playing at a high level".

The New York Times - Sports

It would be equal to 5.3 percent of the nation's total output, or gross domestic product — about half of what the deficit was relative to the size of the weaker economy in fiscal year 2009 when Mr. Obama took office, but still higher than the roughly 3 percent level that many economists consider the maximum that is sustainable in a growing economy.

The New York Times

For example for Dhaka city, it would be equal to 23.7°.

Renewables: Wind, Water, and Solar

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

50 human-written examples

Then, before sampling θ i, r h s i would be equal to equation (33).

Genetics, Selection, Evolution

Also, the mean service time in the service station a, g a (x a ), is assumed to be a non-increasing function of the amount of resource x a allocated to it that would be equal to g a x a = 1 μ a ∀ a ∈ A Open image in new window (11).

Journal of Industrial Engineering International

"My idea was to have it so that the putter would be equal to or less than the shortest club in your bag," Woods said.

The New York Times

My idea was to have it so that the putter would be equal to or less than the shortest club in your bag.

Independent

He said it could lead to cooperation that would be equal to that now provided by European authorities.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "it would be equal to" when you want to express an exact equivalence or mathematical equality between two values or concepts. Ensure that both sides of the comparison are clearly defined to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "it would be equal to" when describing subjective qualities or preferences, as this phrase implies a precise equivalence that doesn't apply to abstract comparisons. Use "similar to" or "comparable to" instead.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it would be equal to" functions as a comparative expression, establishing a relationship of equivalence between two entities or values. It's used to equate one thing to another, indicating they are the same in amount, size, value, or degree. Ludwig confirms this usage.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

30%

News & Media

40%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Formal & Business

10%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "it would be equal to" is a grammatically sound expression used to establish equivalence between two things. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage in English writing. It's commonly found in news, scientific, and wiki contexts, indicating a precise comparison. Alternatives include "it would be equivalent to" or "it would amount to". When using this phrase, ensure you're denoting a true equality rather than a general similarity. Although the frequency is only “Uncommon”, this phrase is valid and useful for making direct comparisons.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it would be equivalent to

Replaces 'equal' with 'equivalent', emphasizing functional similarity.

it would amount to

Indicates a total or result, focusing on the final quantity or value.

it would be comparable to

Suggests a degree of similarity, but not necessarily exact equivalence.

it would be on par with

Implies a similar level of quality or status.

it would correspond to

Highlights a direct relationship or matching between two things.

it would represent

Focuses on what something symbolizes or signifies.

it would mirror

Implies an almost exact resemblance or reflection.

it would be akin to

Suggests a resemblance or similarity in nature or quality.

it would approximate to

Indicates an estimated or close value, not necessarily exact.

it would parallel

Emphasizes a similarity or analogy between two things happening simultaneously.

FAQs

How can I use "it would be equal to" in a sentence?

Use "it would be equal to" to show equivalence between two values or quantities. For example: "If we double the investment, the return "it would be equal to" our initial capital".

What are some alternatives to "it would be equal to"?

Alternatives include "it would be equivalent to", "it would amount to", or "it would be comparable to" depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "it would be equal to" or "it would equal"?

"It would be equal to" is generally more formal and precise. "It would equal" is also acceptable but less common in formal writing. Both are grammatically sound, but "it would be equal to" is often preferred for clarity.

What is the difference between "it would be equal to" and "it would be similar to"?

"It would be equal to" implies an exact equivalence, while "it would be similar to" suggests a resemblance or approximation. Use "it would be equal to" when you mean the values are exactly the same; use "it would be similar to" when there is a degree of difference but a general likeness.