it would be disruptive

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it would be disruptive" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing potential negative impacts or interruptions that may arise from a certain action or situation. Example: "If we change the meeting time at the last minute, it would be disruptive to everyone's schedule."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

21 human-written examples

It would be disruptive.

The Economist

"I thought it would be disruptive to make a film that would last a lifetime," says Conrad.

The Guardian - Music

Another added that CBBC has been instrumental in shaping children's bedtimes and changing it would be disruptive.

The Guardian

"I thought it would be disruptive to have an election with the Rio Olympics right around the corner," he said in the assembly after submitting his resignation.

The New York Times

"It would be disruptive in terms of traffic to have the rally there," Paul J. Browne, the Police Department's chief spokesman, said yesterday.

The New York Times

"It would be disruptive to the home-building industry," Ms. Johnson said, adding that most home builders had loan arrangements with financial institutions.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

39 human-written examples

Some observers said the Mets shouldn't do it, that such special treatment would be disruptive in the clubhouse.

The New York Times - Sports

Creating a sustainable palette of materials would be disruptive to the world of production, but it's also incredibly complicated.

The Guardian

Deregulation would be disruptive: many generalist "country lawyers" could be swept away.But it would have a big payoff.

The Economist

He said canceling the program, however, would be "disruptive".

The Guardian

This would be disruptive even if managers were felt to deserve what they are paid.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "it would be disruptive", consider specifying the context and who or what would be affected. This provides clarity and strengthens the impact of your statement.

Common error

Avoid using "it would be disruptive" as a standalone statement without explaining why or how something is disruptive. Always provide context to make the disruption clear and relevant to your audience.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it would be disruptive" functions as a descriptor, indicating that a particular action or event has the potential to cause interruptions, disturbances, or problems. Ludwig AI confirms its usability. Examples show its application in contexts ranging from airport expansions to business decisions.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

82%

Wiki

9%

Science

9%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "it would be disruptive" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression to convey the potential for disturbance or interruption. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness. Its usage spans diverse contexts, primarily in News & Media. When employing this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying the affected parties and context. Consider related alternatives such as "it would be problematic" or "it would cause a disturbance" for nuanced expression. By following these guidelines, you can effectively communicate potential disruptions and inform decision-making.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it would be problematic

This alternative focuses on the potential problems or difficulties that could arise, shifting the emphasis from mere disruption to the negative consequences.

it would cause a disturbance

This alternative uses more direct language to describe the action of disrupting, emphasizing the resulting disturbance.

it would create chaos

This alternative intensifies the level of disruption, suggesting a state of complete disorder.

it would lead to turmoil

This alternative focuses on the potential for instability and unrest as a result of the action.

it would upset the balance

This alternative highlights the disruption of an existing equilibrium or harmony.

it would interfere with

This alternative emphasizes the obstruction or hindrance that would occur.

it would throw things into disarray

This alternative describes the act of scattering or disorganizing something, emphasizing the loss of order.

it would be an impediment

This alternative focuses on the hindering or obstructing effect of the action.

it would cause upheaval

This alternative suggests a significant disruption that causes major changes or unrest.

it would hinder progress

This alternative concentrates on the act of delaying or impeding advancement.

FAQs

How can I use "it would be disruptive" in a sentence?

You can use "it would be disruptive" to express that something may cause interruptions or problems. For example, "Changing the deadline now "it would be disruptive" to the project's timeline."

What can I say instead of "it would be disruptive"?

Alternatives to "it would be disruptive" include "it would be problematic", "it would cause a disturbance", or "it would interfere with", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use "it will be disruptive" or "it would be disruptive"?

The choice between "it will be disruptive" and "it would be disruptive" depends on the context. "It will be disruptive" states a future certainty, while "it would be disruptive" suggests a hypothetical or conditional outcome.

What's the difference between "disruptive" and "problematic"?

"Disruptive" implies an interruption or disturbance to a process or system. "Problematic", on the other hand, suggests that something causes difficulties or poses problems, which may or may not involve a disruption. Using "it would be problematic" focuses more on the potential issues that arise.