it was valid

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it was valid" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something was acceptable, legitimate, or justified in a particular context. Example: "After reviewing the evidence, I concluded that it was valid to question the results of the experiment."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

43 human-written examples

Mr. Footman renewed his hack license last year, and it was valid until its expiration date next February.

The New York Times

And it was valid.

The Guardian - Sport

When I did the research, I thought it was valid".

Independent

A separate test showed that it was valid and that no drugs were present.

The New York Times

So, arguably, it was valid for him to be kept in the loop.

The Guardian - Sport

It was valid in 1942, the year the novel was published, and it's still valid today.

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

17 human-written examples

It is valid, and its premises are true.

SEP

However, it's valid.

The New York Times

"It's valid.

The New York Times

It is valid through April.

The New York Times - Travel

But it is valid journalism.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "it was valid", ensure the context clearly establishes what "it" refers to. This avoids ambiguity and ensures the statement's meaning is easily understood.

Common error

Avoid using "it was valid" as a filler phrase. Ensure that you are actually conveying that something was legitimate, justified, or correct based on evidence or reason, rather than simply stating it without support.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it was valid" functions as a statement of affirmation, asserting that something met the required criteria or standards. It is commonly used to express agreement or confirmation, as demonstrated by Ludwig examples, where the validity of claims, tests, or procedures is affirmed.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

36%

Formal & Business

8%

Less common in

Wiki

4%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "it was valid" is a common and grammatically correct way to express that something was legitimate, justified, or correct. As Ludwig AI explains, it's used across various contexts, from news and media to scientific and formal settings. While versatile, it's essential to ensure clarity by clearly defining what "it" refers to and providing adequate justification for the claim. Alternatives such as "it was legitimate" or "it was justifiable" can offer nuanced meanings, depending on the context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it was legitimate

Replaces "valid" with "legitimate", emphasizing adherence to laws or rules.

it was justifiable

Replaces "valid" with "justifiable", focusing on whether there were good reasons for it.

it was acceptable

Replaces "valid" with "acceptable", suggesting that it met certain standards or expectations.

it was sound

Emphasizes the reasonableness and logical coherence.

it was correct

Indicates that it conformed to facts or standards.

it was well-founded

Suggests that it had a solid basis or foundation.

it was warranted

Implies that it was justified or deserved based on the circumstances.

it was permissible

Focuses on whether it was allowed or authorized.

it was in order

Suggests that it followed the rules or procedures.

it was substantiated

Emphasizes that it was supported by evidence.

FAQs

How can I use "it was valid" in a sentence?

You can use "it was valid" to express that something was legitimate, justified, or correct. For example, "The judge determined that the evidence was admissible because "it was valid" under the law."

What are some alternatives to "it was valid"?

Some alternatives include "it was legitimate", "it was justifiable", or "it was acceptable", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it more formal to say "it was valid" or "it was alright"?

"It was valid" is generally more formal than "it was alright". The former is suitable for professional or academic contexts, while the latter is more casual.

What does "it was valid" imply about the subject?

"It was valid" implies that the subject met certain criteria or standards, making it acceptable, legitimate, or justified in a specific context. It suggests that there's a reasonable basis for its existence or occurrence.