Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

it was understood

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"it was understood" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when something is accepted as a fact or implied without it needing to be explicitly stated. For example, "The rules of the game were explained and it was understood that everyone would follow them."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

53 human-written examples

Cervical cancer was not commonly recognized, though it was understood generally in terms of its symptoms.

It was understood.

News & Media

The New York Times

"I thought it was understood".

Nothing was said, but it was understood".

The alternative, it was understood, was removal by the military.

News & Media

The New Yorker

It was understood as a source of power.

News & Media

The New Yorker

It was understood that the hospitality would not be returned.

News & Media

The New Yorker

It was understood that there was something charming about me.

News & Media

The New Yorker

But it was understood that there was more to come.

Still, it was understood that the focus should be on essentials, not long-term projects.

It was understood a burst tire was responsible for the crash.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "it was understood" to convey a sense of shared, often unspoken, agreement or knowledge. This phrase works best when the understanding is implicit from the context and doesn't need explicit declaration.

Common error

Avoid using "it was understood" excessively in formal or academic writing where explicit statements and evidence are preferred. Replace it with more direct statements to maintain clarity and rigor.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it was understood" functions as a passive construction, indicating a state of shared agreement, tacit knowledge, or an implicit assumption. Ludwig AI confirms this, highlighting its common usage in conveying something accepted without needing explicit declaration.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

59%

Science

25%

Formal & Business

16%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "it was understood" is a versatile and commonly used expression to denote shared agreement or tacit knowledge. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically correct and suitable for various contexts, predominantly in news, media, and scientific writing. While versatile, it's essential to use the phrase judiciously in formal writing, favoring more explicit language for clarity. Alternatives such as "it was agreed" or "it was assumed" can provide nuanced meanings depending on the specific context. By understanding the nuances of the phrase, writers can effectively communicate implicit understandings while avoiding common pitfalls.

FAQs

How do I use "it was understood" in a sentence?

Use "it was understood" to indicate a shared agreement or tacit knowledge without needing explicit communication. For example, "After the meeting, "it was understood" that everyone would contribute to the project".

What can I say instead of "it was understood"?

You can use alternatives like "it was agreed", "it was assumed", or "it was implied" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "it was understood" or "it is understood"?

The choice between "it was understood" and "it is understood" depends on the timeframe. "It was understood" refers to a past understanding, while "it is understood" indicates a current understanding. Choose the tense that correctly reflects the time frame of the understanding.

What is the difference between "it was understood" and "it was known"?

"It was understood" implies a shared agreement or tacit knowledge, while "it was known" simply means something was a recognized fact. For example, "it was known" that the project was delayed, but "it was understood" that everyone would still contribute.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: