it was sentences

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it was sentences" is grammatically correct but may not be commonly used in written English without context.
You can use it when referring to a situation where something was identified or described as being composed of sentences. Example: "In the analysis of the text, it was sentences that conveyed the author's main ideas clearly."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

"It was sentences like that (36th over) that lured me into cricket in the first place," says Sara Torvalds.

The Guardian - Sport

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

It is sentences, and not words, that are thus the primary focus for a Davidsonian theory of meaning.

SEP

Thus it would seem that it is sentence meanings that have modal properties for Richard.

SEP

Failing to restore it is sentencing it to a messy death.

Huffington Post

For now, it's sentencing reform that raises the biggest questions.

Huffington Post

Unfortunately, once an item is deemed garbage, it's sentenced to the landfill today more often than not.

Huffington Post

A POS-tagged text implies that it is also sentence boundary detected and tokenized, and a tokenized text implies that it is sentence detected.

Bioinformatics

At the end of it, Abel was sentenced to seven years in prison.

The New Yorker

It was three sentences long.

The New York Times

The burglar said he had been "forced" to write it after being sentenced.

The Guardian

It was the sentencing issue.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "it was sentences", ensure the context clearly indicates what 'it' refers to, providing clarity and avoiding ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "it was sentences" without a clear antecedent for 'it'. Ensure the reader understands what 'it' refers to in the context.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it was sentences" functions as a subject complement, further defining or describing the subject ('it'). According to Ludwig, the grammatical structure is correct, though the usage frequency is low.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

34%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

33%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "it was sentences" is grammatically sound yet infrequent in common usage. As Ludwig AI shows, this structure aims to define or clarify something by stating that it consists of sentences. It leans toward a neutral to formal register and is found across diverse domains like news, science, and general media. To ensure the phrase's effectiveness, ensure there's a clear antecedent for 'it'. Alternatives like "it consisted of sentences" or "sentences comprised it" offer semantically similar options to enhance clarity or style.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it consisted of sentences

Replaces 'was' with 'consisted of' to indicate composition.

it was made of sentences

Simple statement of composition using 'made of'.

sentences comprised it

Changes the word order to emphasize the sentences as components.

sentences constructed it

Focuses on the building aspect using sentences.

sentences formed it

Emphasizes the act of sentences creating a whole.

it featured sentences

Highlights the inclusion of sentences as a prominent aspect.

it included sentences

Indicates the presence of sentences as part of something.

sentences were its components

More formal way of stating the composition.

sentences made it up

Informal way of saying sentences constituted it.

the sentences defined it

Changes focus emphasizing the defining nature of sentences.

FAQs

How can I use "it was sentences" in a sentence?

Use "it was sentences" when referring to something specifically composed of sentences. For example, "In the legal document, "it was sentences" that defined the terms of agreement".

What can I say instead of "it was sentences"?

You can use alternatives like "it consisted of sentences", "sentences comprised it", or "sentences formed it" depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Which is correct, "it was sentences" or "there were sentences"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct but have different meanings. "It was sentences" implies that a specific 'it' is composed of sentences. "There were sentences" indicates the existence of sentences in a general context.

What is the difference between "it was sentences" and "it contained sentences"?

"It was sentences" suggests that sentences were the entirety or defining feature of something. "It contained sentences" simply means sentences were present within something larger. For example, a paragraph contains sentences, but a list might be sentences.