Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
it was revised by
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "it was revised by" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when indicating that a document, text, or piece of work has been modified or edited by someone. Example: "The final report was revised by the lead editor to ensure clarity and accuracy."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Encyclopedias
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
9 human-written examples
It was revised by its authors for two movie versions (in 1936 and 1951) and for subsequent stage outings.
News & Media
The Charter of 1814 was retained but no longer as a royal gift to the nation; it was revised by the Chamber of Deputies and in its new form imposed on the king.
Encyclopedias
It was revised by the author in 1879 for publication in England.
Encyclopedias
This poem was amended on 10 and 11 April 2012 after it was revised by the translator.
News & Media
After passing through 10 editions it was revised by the British professor H.S.M. Coxeter in 1938; it is still a standard reference.
Encyclopedias
Mr. Smith, who describes himself as "a recovering Catholic," said the script was not especially contentious when it was revised by the show's mostly male writing staff.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
51 human-written examples
It is revised by the UNICEF secretariat throughout the year based on requests made by the Executive Board and other proposals endorsed by the Bureau.
Science
TNA is an approach devised by Hennessy-Hicks [ 22] and it was revised and adapted by the central and coordinator research teams [ 21] to make it appropriate for NCDs, including their social determinants, and the five selected research disciplines.
Science
In 2015, it was revised and restructured by Rosalind Chaplin and Emily Hodges.
Science
It was revised and updated by Merlin Holland in 1989.
Wiki
Written in 1918 by William Strunk, it was revised in the 1950s by his former pupil EB White – hence the practice of calling it "Strunk and White".
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "it was revised by", ensure the context clearly indicates who performed the revision and what aspects were altered for clarity.
Common error
Avoid using "it was revised by" without specifying who performed the revision. This can lead to ambiguity and make the statement less informative.
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "it was revised by" functions as a passive construction, indicating that a subject (e.g., document, text) underwent modification by an agent. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English. Examples show usage in various contexts, like literary works and scientific papers.
Frequent in
Science
44%
News & Media
31%
Encyclopedias
9%
Less common in
Wiki
9%
Formal & Business
0%
Academia
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "it was revised by" is a grammatically sound passive construction used to attribute modification to an agent. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase is correct and usable. It commonly appears in scientific and news contexts, as well as encyclopedias, indicating a broad applicability. While versatile, it is crucial to specify the agent who made the revisions to maintain clarity and avoid ambiguity. Alternatives include "it was edited by" and "it was modified by", offering similar meanings with subtle differences in connotation.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
it was edited by
Focuses specifically on editing, implying correction and refinement.
it was amended by
Suggests a formal addition or alteration, often in legal or official contexts.
it was modified by
Indicates a change in form or content, without necessarily implying improvement.
it was altered by
Implies a change, possibly a significant one, to the original form.
it was adapted by
Suggests changes made to suit a new purpose or condition.
it was updated by
Implies that it has been brought to a more current version.
it was improved by
Specifically indicates that changes were made to enhance quality or performance.
it was reworked by
Suggests a more thorough and extensive revision.
it was refined by
Indicates that changes were made to improve precision or subtlety.
it was overhauled by
Suggests a complete and thorough renovation or revision.
FAQs
How to use "it was revised by" in a sentence?
Use "it was revised by" to indicate that someone has made changes to a document, text, or other work. For example, "The manuscript "it was revised by" the editor to improve clarity".
What can I say instead of "it was revised by"?
You can use alternatives like "it was edited by", "it was amended by", or "it was modified by" depending on the context.
Which is correct, "it was revised by" or "it was reviewed by"?
"It was revised by" indicates changes were made, while "it was reviewed by" suggests it was examined but not necessarily altered.
What's the difference between "it was revised by" and "it was corrected by"?
"It was revised by" implies a more comprehensive alteration, while "it was corrected by" focuses on fixing errors or inaccuracies.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested