Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

it was noisy

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"it was noisy" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to describe a situation in which noise was an issue. For example: "The concert was a memorable experience, but it was noisy and my ears were ringing afterwards."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

46 human-written examples

It was noisy.

News & Media

The New Yorker

It was noisy with birds.

News & Media

The New Yorker

It was noisy all the time before.

News & Media

The Guardian

"People say it was noisy," Mr. Klein said.

News & Media

The New York Times

It was noisy and a lot of fun.

It was noisy, unheated, drafty, hard to fly and fragile.

Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

14 human-written examples

It is noisy and genial.

"It's noisy," he said.

News & Media

The New York Times

Not all of it is noisy.

News & Media

The New Yorker

It's noisy, brash and bludgeoningly funny.

News & Media

The Guardian

It's noisy, riotous, and pop-cultural.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing a specific location or event, follow "it was noisy" with details about the source or type of noise to provide a clearer picture for the reader.

Common error

Avoid using "it was noisy" as a standalone statement. Always provide context or specifics to enhance the reader's understanding of the sound and its impact. Instead of simply saying "it was noisy", specify what made it so, e.g., "it was noisy due to the construction work next door".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it was noisy" functions as a descriptive statement, attributing the quality of being noisy to a particular subject or situation. It follows a simple subject-verb-adjective structure. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase is perfectly usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

68%

Academia

17%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Science

5%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "it was noisy" is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase to describe a situation characterized by a high level of sound. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English. The phrase is most frequently found in news and media contexts, but also appears in academic and general writing. When using this phrase, consider adding specific details about the source or nature of the noise to provide clarity. Alternatives like "it was loud" or "there was a lot of noise" can also be used depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

FAQs

How can I use "it was noisy" in a sentence?

You can use "it was noisy" to describe a place or situation where there was a lot of sound. For example, "The market was bustling and "it was noisy" with vendors calling out prices and people chatting".

What can I say instead of "it was noisy"?

You can use alternatives like "it was loud", "there was a lot of noise", or "the sound was deafening" depending on the context.

Is "it was noisy" grammatically correct?

Yes, "it was noisy" is grammatically correct. It follows the standard subject-verb-adjective structure.

What's the difference between "it was noisy" and "there was noise"?

"It was noisy" describes the state of a place or situation, while "there was noise" simply indicates the presence of noise. The former focuses on the characteristic, the latter on the existence of sound. In many cases, "it was loud" is a good substitutive.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: