Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
it was labeled
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "it was labeled" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that has been marked or identified with a label in the past. Example: "The box was opened, and it was labeled as containing fragile items."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Wiki
Alternative expressions(20)
it was marked
it was tagged
it was designated
it was identified as
it was classified as
it was called
it was termed
it was referred to as
it was known as
it was defined as
it was accused
it was described
it was flagged
it was mark
it was bought
it was planned
it was painted
it was fabricated
it was heralded
it was named
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
59 human-written examples
When a specimen had no double-labeled surface (dLS/BS = 0), it was labeled as "no data" for MAR and BFR/BS45.
Science & Research
It was labeled an "album highlight and stellar pop song" with its "pulsing electronic beat and overwhelming sexuality".
Wiki
It was labeled "Vision".
News & Media
It was labeled "manmade silk".
News & Media
It was labeled Blitum foliosum.
News & Media
But it was labeled: Appalachian State University.
News & Media
It was labeled "kidney preservative fluid".
News & Media
It was labeled 33A on the map.
News & Media
It was labeled: "Oprah's Book Club Selection #63.
News & Media
It was labeled a portrait of Rodin's mother.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
1 human-written examples
That was how it was labelled.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "it was labeled", ensure that the label accurately reflects the object or concept being described. Misleading labels can cause confusion or misinterpretation.
Common error
Avoid using "it was labeled" when the labeling is subjective or lacks supporting evidence. Ensure the label is based on verifiable information to maintain credibility.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "it was labeled" functions as a passive construction, indicating that something received a label. Ludwig AI examples show it's commonly used to describe how items, concepts, or situations have been categorized or identified. The phrase emphasizes the action of labeling rather than the agent performing the action.
Frequent in
News & Media
51%
Science
31%
Wiki
5%
Less common in
Academia
3%
Formal & Business
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "it was labeled" is a versatile passive construction used to denote that something has been given a specific designation or classification. According to Ludwig, this phrase is grammatically correct and sees frequent use across a range of sources, particularly in News & Media and Science. While suitable for formal and neutral contexts, it is important to ensure that labels are accurate and well-supported to avoid misinterpretation. Related phrases, such as "it was designated" or "it was identified as", can offer nuanced alternatives depending on the context. As Ludwig AI confirms, "it was labeled" serves to provide clarity or context by specifying how something has been categorized.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
it was designated
Replaces "labeled" with "designated", implying a more official or formal assignment of a category or role.
it was identified as
Emphasizes the act of recognizing and classifying something, suitable for scientific or investigative contexts.
it was classified as
Highlights the process of sorting something into a specific category or group.
it was termed
Uses "termed" instead of "labeled", often used when introducing a specific name or expression.
it was referred to as
Indicates that something is known or mentioned by a particular name or description.
it was tagged as
Similar to "labeled", but often used in digital or informal contexts.
it was known as
Focuses on the common or recognized name of something.
it was branded as
Implies a marketing or reputational aspect, suggesting a deliberate attempt to associate something with a particular image.
it was characterized as
Describes the essential nature or qualities of something.
it was defined as
Highlights a formal or precise explanation of meaning.
FAQs
What can I say instead of "it was labeled"?
You can use alternatives like "it was designated", "it was identified as", or "it was classified as" depending on the context.
How to use "it was labeled" in a sentence?
Use "it was labeled" to indicate that something was given a specific name or category. For example, "The package arrived, and "it was labeled" 'Fragile'". Consider the context to choose the most appropriate synonym for clarity.
Which is correct, "it was labeled" or "it is labeled"?
"It was labeled" indicates a past action, while "it is labeled" indicates a present state. Use ""it was labeled"" when referring to a label that was applied in the past and remains valid.
What is the difference between "it was labeled" and "it was called"?
"It was labeled" suggests a physical or formal designation, while "it was called" implies a name or description that might be informal or widely known. For example, ""it was labeled" 'Handle with care,'" versus "it was called the 'Miracle on Grass'".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested