it was joined

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it was joined" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something was connected or united with something else in the past. Example: "The two sections of the bridge were completed separately, but it was joined together during the final construction phase."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

During the latter part of its stay, it was joined by Mrs. Sidney Legendre, an American explorer.

The New Yorker

It was joined in its campaign yesterday by President Hassan Rouhani, the newly elected political leader of Iran.

The Telegraph

It was joined in its challenge to the FCC by the State of California and the Consumer Federation of America.

Forbes

It was joined just before its exit to the sea by the Bytham, now vanished, a river that drained central England.

The New York Times - Science

It was joined by other holes.

The New York Times - Magazine

About 17 minutes later, it was joined by another.

The New York Times

It was joined by another, preparing to hunt.

Independent

It was joined by the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory in 1991.

University of California, Berkeley

It was joined, a mere three days later, by Benjamin Franklin's General Magazine.

Encyclopedia Britannica

It lies opposite the Sorrento peninsula, to which it was joined in prehistoric times.

Encyclopedia Britannica

It was joined to Nova Scotia but in 1784 became a separate British crown colony.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "it was joined" to clearly indicate the passive act of something being connected or combined with something else, ensuring the subject receiving the action is the focus.

Common error

Avoid using "it was joined" when the active voice is more appropriate or clearer. For example, instead of "It was joined by the team," consider "The team joined it" if the team is the main actor.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it was joined" functions as a passive construction, indicating that the subject underwent the action of being connected or united. Ludwig examples show its use across diverse contexts, confirming its role in denoting connection or addition.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Encyclopedias

25%

Wiki

20%

Less common in

Academia

5%

Science

5%

Formal & Business

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "it was joined" is a versatile and grammatically sound passive construction used to describe the act of something being connected or unified with something else. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and widespread use across various authoritative sources like the New York Times and Encyclopedia Britannica. While predominantly found in news, encyclopedic, and wiki contexts, its neutral register makes it suitable for diverse writing styles. Remember to use it to clearly indicate a past connection, focusing on the subject receiving the action.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it was connected

Focuses on the physical or logical link established.

it was linked

Emphasizes the bond or association created.

it was attached

Emphasizes the act of fastening or connecting something.

it was united

Highlights the merging or unification of elements.

it was coupled

Suggests a pairing or close association.

it was merged

Implies a complete blending into one entity.

it was appended

Indicates an addition or attachment to something larger.

it was affixed

Stresses a secure or permanent attachment.

it was incorporated

Highlights the inclusion within a larger system.

it was amalgamated

Suggests a complex combination or blending of multiple parts.

FAQs

How can I use "it was joined" in a sentence?

Use "it was joined" to describe something being connected or combined with something else. For example, "The two pieces of the sculpture were created separately, then "it was joined" to form the final artwork."

What are some alternatives to "it was joined"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "it was connected", "it was linked", or "it was united".

Is "it was joined by" grammatically correct?

Yes, "it was joined by" is grammatically correct. It's used to indicate that something was connected or accompanied by something else. For example, "The main road "it was joined" by a smaller side street."

What's the difference between "it was joined to" and "it was joined with"?

"It was joined to" suggests a physical connection or attachment, while "it was joined with" implies a more integrated combination. For example, "The bridge section "it was joined" to the existing structure," versus "The sauce "it was joined" with herbs and spices."