it was involved

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it was involved" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something or someone participated in a situation or event. Example: "The committee reviewed the proposal, and it was involved in the decision-making process."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

The FARC denied it was involved.

The Economist

Russia again denied it was involved.

The Guardian

The ISI has denied it was involved in the killing.

The New York Times

The company's board denied yesterday that it was involved in such a search.

The New York Times

But until now scientists did not know how it was involved in the disease.

The New York Times - Health

An official of the group based in London denied that it was involved.

The New York Times

Hamas has praised the kidnappings but has denied Israeli allegations that it was involved.

The Guardian

The RSPB said it was involved with three of the six successful nests.

The Guardian

The caption stated incorrectly that it was involved with gasoline smuggling.

The New York Times

The MQM has denied a police claim that it was involved in the murder.

The Economist

But a spokesman for his rebel group denied it was involved.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "it was involved" to clearly and directly state that something or someone had a role or connection to an event or situation. This phrase works well across various registers, from news reports to academic writing. Be specific about the nature of the involvement if possible to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

While "it was involved" is grammatically sound, overuse of passive voice can make your writing less engaging. Consider rephrasing to highlight the actor and their action, such as "it actively participated" or "it played a key role" to make the sentence more dynamic.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it was involved" primarily functions as part of a clause to indicate participation, association, or connection of a subject (represented by "it") with an event, activity, or situation. As Ludwig AI states, this phrase is correct and widely used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

25%

Encyclopedias

10%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "it was involved" is a grammatically sound and common way to indicate participation, connection, or association. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English across various contexts. As the analysis shows, this phrase is very common, especially in News & Media and Scientific domains, maintaining a neutral register. When using "it was involved", remember to provide sufficient context to avoid ambiguity and consider active voice alternatives for more engaging writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it participated

Emphasizes active participation in an event or activity, suggesting a more deliberate role.

it took part

Similar to "it participated", but can imply a more general or less active role.

it was a participant

Highlights the role as one of many involved.

it played a role

Suggests a significant influence or contribution to an event.

it had a hand in

Indicates influence or contribution, often in a collaborative effort.

it was implicated

Implies a connection, often with negative or questionable undertones.

it was connected

Highlights a relationship or association without necessarily implying direct action.

it was associated

Similar to "it was connected", suggesting a link or relationship.

it was concerned

Highlights direct concern or interest in the event or matter.

it was instrumental

Emphasizes its importance or necessity in achieving a particular outcome.

FAQs

How can I use "it was involved" in a sentence?

You can use "it was involved" to indicate participation or connection to something. For example, "The company confirmed that "it was involved" in the negotiations".

What's a more formal alternative to "it was involved"?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases like "it participated", "it played a role", or "it was instrumental" depending on the context.

How does "it was involved" differ from "it was implicated"?

"It was involved" generally indicates a neutral connection or participation, while "it was implicated" suggests a more negative or questionable connection, often implying wrongdoing or suspicion. The phrase "it was implicated" has stronger implications of being tied to an undesirable outcome.

Is it better to say "it was involved in" or "it was involved with"?

Both "it was involved in" and "it was involved with" are grammatically correct, but "it was involved in" is generally more common and preferred when referring to activities or events. "It was involved with" might be more appropriate when referring to people or organizations.