it was information

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it was information" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to a specific piece of information that was previously mentioned or discussed. Example: "After reviewing the documents, I realized that it was information I had overlooked during my initial analysis."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

33 human-written examples

It was information technology, not engineering.

The New York Times

More recently, it was information technology.

The New York Times

"But it was information I was pysched to have.

The New York Times

Instead, it was information on maintaining a healthy heart.

The New York Times

"It was incorrect information, it was information excluded from evidence, it was information Ford was unable to respond to, and it was information that played right into the plaintiffs' theme," Mr. Boutrous said.

The New York Times

It was information that was full of holes, full of errors.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

25 human-written examples

"It's information.

The New York Times

They think it's information".

The New York Times

"It's information," he said.

The New Yorker

No, it's information.

The New York Times - Sports

"It's information overload".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "it was information", ensure the context clearly establishes what "it" refers to, avoiding ambiguity for the reader.

Common error

Avoid using "it was information" in overly simplistic sentences where a more direct and descriptive term could add clarity and impact. For example, instead of "It was information about the company's profits," consider "The report detailed the company's profits."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it was information" serves as a predicative nominative, identifying what 'it' (a previously mentioned subject) is. It clarifies the nature or content of something under discussion. As Ludwig AI points out, the phrase is grammatically correct and serves to provide additional details or explanations.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

40%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "it was information" functions to clarify or specify what something previously mentioned actually is, with Ludwig AI confirming its grammatical correctness and usability. Though the phrase appears infrequently, it finds its niche primarily in news and media alongside science-related contexts. When incorporating this phrase into your writing, clarity in reference is key, and it's essential to avoid relying on it in situations where a stronger term would work better. Alternatives like "it constituted data" or "it comprised knowledge" provide nuance based on the specific nature of what is being described.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it constituted data

Replaces 'information' with 'data', implying a more structured or quantifiable form.

it comprised knowledge

Uses 'knowledge' to suggest a deeper, more comprehensive understanding.

it consisted of details

Emphasizes the particular aspects or components that make up the whole.

it amounted to intelligence

Conveys that the information had strategic or analytical value.

it represented insight

Highlights the understanding gained from the information.

it served as input

Focuses on the role of information as a contribution to a process or system.

it provided clarity

Indicates that the information made something easier to understand.

it revealed facts

Suggests the information uncovered objective truths.

it was a revelation

Implies the information was surprising or significant.

it unfolded as data

Rephrases the sentence in a more descriptive manner, emphasizing the way data is shown over time.

FAQs

How can I use "it was information" in a sentence?

Use "it was information" to refer back to something that has already been discussed or implied. For example, "The documents contained key details; "it was information" that helped solve the mystery."

What are some alternatives to "it was information"?

Depending on the context, you could use alternatives such as "it was data", "it was knowledge", or "it was details". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "it was information" or "there was information"?

The choice depends on the context. "It was information" refers back to specific details, while "there was information" introduces new information without specifying its exact nature initially.

What's the difference between "it was information" and "it is information"?

"It was information" describes something from the past. "It is information" describes something in the present. For example: "The report contained key findings; "it was information" essential to the project's success". In contrast: "This document contains sensitive data; "it is information" that must be protected."