Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
it was fed
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "it was fed" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that has been given food or nourishment in the past. Example: "The puppy looked content after it was fed."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Academia
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Founder Daniel Bear says: We can tell you the postcode of each and every joint, its husbandry, what it was fed on.
News & Media
In order to achieve this, the dimensions of the patch were not square but slightly rectangular and it was fed along its diagonal dimension.
Then Baring's hired him for its Tokyo office, despite his complete ignorance of banking, because it was "fed up with sending bankers out who couldn't understand Japan".
News & Media
It was fed to me wrong".
News & Media
A: It was fed to the camels.
Academia
It was fed up with London's bias towards London.
News & Media
It was watered, it was fed with Miracle-Gro.
News & Media
It was fed into a filter that cut out frequencies outside the human vocal range.
Academia
It was fed by strips of belts, each holding 24 30 rounds.
Encyclopedias
But it was fed back and I do hear that positive change is being made".
News & Media
A three-judge state appeals court panel decided last month it was fed up.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "it was fed" to describe data input in technical contexts, consider specifying the type of data for clarity. For example: "It was fed images of slides."
Common error
Avoid using "it was fed" when a more precise verb better conveys the intended meaning. For example, instead of "it was fed by rumors", consider "it was fueled by rumors" or "it was based on rumors".
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "it was fed" primarily functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that something received nourishment, input, or resources. As Ludwig AI indicates, it's grammatically sound and usable in various contexts.
Frequent in
News & Media
35%
Science
35%
Academia
10%
Less common in
Wiki
5%
Formal & Business
5%
Encyclopedias
5%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "it was fed" is a grammatically correct and frequently used passive construction that describes the act of providing something—whether sustenance, data, or fuel—to a subject. Ludwig AI confirms its usability across diverse contexts. It's commonly found in news, scientific, and academic writing, indicating its versatility. To enhance clarity, especially in technical contexts, specify the type of input provided. Avoid using "it was fed" when a more precise verb could better convey the intended meaning, such as using "fueled" instead of "fed" when discussing abstract concepts. By understanding these nuances, you can effectively incorporate "it was fed" into your writing.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
it was nourished
This alternative focuses on the act of providing essential substances for growth and health.
it received nourishment
This alternative emphasizes the act of receiving nourishment, which is a more formal way of saying something was fed.
it was sustained by
This emphasizes the continuous support provided by the feeding, highlighting ongoing maintenance.
it was given sustenance
Similar to "it received nourishment", but emphasizes the act of giving rather than receiving.
it obtained sustenance
This phrase is a more formal and technical way to express that something received the necessary resources to survive or function.
it drew sustenance from
This phrase emphasizes the source from which something is being fed or nourished.
it was provided with
This alternative is more general and can apply to various types of provisions, not just food.
it thrived on
This highlights the positive outcome of being fed, suggesting growth or success.
it consumed
This shifts the focus to the act of consuming, which might be relevant in certain contexts.
it ingested
A more technical term for consuming, often used in scientific or medical contexts.
FAQs
How can I use "it was fed" in a sentence?
The phrase "it was fed" can be used to describe the act of providing nourishment, information, or resources to something. For example: "The baby bird chirped loudly after "it was fed" by its mother" or "The algorithm improved as "it was fed" more data".
What are some alternatives to saying "it was fed"?
Depending on the context, you could use alternatives like "it was nourished", "it was provided with", or "it consumed". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is it correct to say "it was fed information"?
Yes, "it was fed information" is a correct and commonly used phrase. It implies that information was provided to something in a systematic or deliberate way. For instance, "The AI system improved as "it was fed information" about customer preferences".
What's the difference between "it was fed" and "it was fueled"?
"It was fed" generally refers to providing sustenance or input. "It was fueled" often implies that something was stimulated or driven by a particular factor. For example, "The fire was fed by the wind", versus "The conflict was fueled by misinformation".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested