it was excluded from

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it was excluded from" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when indicating that something has been left out or not included in a particular context or group. Example: "The proposal was submitted, but it was excluded from the final decision-making process."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

At the resolution of 1 cubic millimeter its margins could not be smoothly segmented, and it was excluded from the manual segmentation.

3D Printing in Medicine

Iron had not presented quantitative extractions and it was excluded from final samples analysis.

Microchemical Journal

Notably, it was excluded from the first two Rugby World Cups in 1987 and 1991.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Therefore, it was excluded from the calculations.

Chemistry Central Journal

If the interaction SLOPE*LOAD was not significant (i.e., P > 0.01), it was excluded from the model.

Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics

Produced CO2 in the incineration process was biogenic in origin; therefore, it was excluded from the GHG counting.

International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering

Since the 5R variant was detected only in 4 patients out 150, it was excluded from statistical analysis.

The Journal of Headache and Pain

As such an event was not reported in the observation, it was excluded from the forecast data.

Earth, Planets and Space

The union, which represents about a third of pilots at the airline, said it was excluded from talks over proposed changes to pilot benefits.

BBC

One animal of the treatment group was euthanized after 9 h for surgical complications, and it was excluded from the final analysis.

Annals of Intensive Care

Interestingly, the number of days of treatment was not a significant predictor for this coupon (p = 0.664), so it was excluded from the model.

AMB Express

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "it was excluded from", ensure the reason for exclusion is clear from the surrounding context. This adds clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "it was excluded from" without specifying the criteria or reason for exclusion. This can lead to confusion and weaken the impact of your statement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it was excluded from" functions as a passive construction, indicating that a particular subject was deliberately left out or omitted from a specific context, group, or process. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and frequent use across diverse sources.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

75%

News & Media

10%

Encyclopedias

5%

Less common in

Wiki

4%

Formal & Business

1%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "it was excluded from" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase, as validated by Ludwig. It serves to explicitly state that something has been deliberately left out or removed from a specific context. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is commonly used across various sources, including science, news, and encyclopedias. To maximize clarity and avoid ambiguity, specify the reasons for exclusion whenever possible. Remember that alternatives like "it was omitted from" or "it was left out of" can be used depending on the desired nuance. While generally neutral to formal, its scientific and academic prevalence suggests a more formal tone.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it has been omitted from

Uses "omitted" which suggests a more deliberate removal.

it was not included in

Directly states the lack of inclusion, which can be more neutral.

it has been left out of

Replaces "excluded" with the phrasal verb "left out", making it slightly more informal.

it was removed from

Focuses on the action of taking something away, rather than preventing its inclusion.

it was omitted from consideration

Specifies that something was not considered, adding more context.

it was absent from

Highlights the absence of something, rather than its active exclusion.

it did not form part of

Emphasizes that something was never a component of the whole.

it was disregarded in

Indicates that something was ignored or not taken into account.

it was rejected from

Suggests a more forceful and negative decision to not include something.

it was precluded from

Implies that something was prevented from being included, often due to a rule or condition.

FAQs

How can I use "it was excluded from" in a sentence?

Use "it was excluded from" to indicate that something was deliberately left out or not included in a particular group, list, or process. For example, "The item was deemed irrelevant, so "it was excluded from" the final report".

What are some alternatives to "it was excluded from"?

You can use alternatives such as "it was omitted from", "it was left out of", or "it was not included in" depending on the specific context.

Is there a difference between "it was excluded from" and "it was omitted from"?

While both phrases convey the idea of something being left out, ""it was excluded from"" often implies a more active or deliberate decision to remove something, while "it was omitted from" can suggest a more passive oversight or unintentional exclusion.

When is it appropriate to use "it was excluded from" in formal writing?

The phrase ""it was excluded from"" is suitable for formal writing when you need to clearly and directly state that something has been deliberately removed or left out of consideration. Ensure that the reason for the exclusion is evident or explained.