Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

it was evidence

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it was evidence" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that serves as proof or indication of a fact or situation in a discussion or argument. Example: "The fingerprints found at the scene were clear; it was evidence of his presence there."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Its chairman Andrew Green said it was "evidence that the government's policies are starting to take effect".

News & Media

BBC

But it was evidence of what is possible.

But it was evidence of Mr. Davis's influence.

News & Media

The New York Times

He said it was evidence that many voters were confused.

News & Media

The New York Times

"It was evidence of a return to normalcy," he said.

News & Media

The New York Times

"It was evidence that the markets are functioning".

News & Media

The New York Times

Reason for confiscating camera was that it was evidence.

News & Media

Independent

If it was evidence, when it was done, it was returned, and it went back.

This wasn't progressive; it was evidence of a shrewd embrace of old-studio-style product diversification.

News & Media

The New York Times

It was evidence of an aerial plankton, an ocean over our heads.

Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

"In fact, a lot of it was evidence-hostile".

News & Media

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "it was evidence" to introduce factual information or findings that support a particular argument or conclusion. This helps to build a stronger and more persuasive case.

Common error

Avoid using "it was evidence" when the information is merely suggestive or circumstantial. Overstating the strength of the evidence can weaken your argument if the evidence is easily refuted or misinterpreted.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it was evidence" functions as a declarative statement introducing factual information or findings. Ludwig AI's examples confirm its use in presenting supportive data, as seen in numerous news articles and academic texts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Academia

20%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Science

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "it was evidence" is a versatile and commonly used phrase that serves to introduce supporting facts or findings. As Ludwig AI's analysis confirms, it is grammatically correct and most frequently found in news and media contexts, also used in academia. When incorporating this phrase into writing, ensure a clear connection between the evidence and the claim it supports, and avoid overstating the strength of the evidence. Consider alternatives like "it served as proof" or "it indicated" depending on the nuance you wish to convey.

FAQs

How can I use "it was evidence" in a sentence?

You can use "it was evidence" to introduce a fact or finding that supports a claim. For example, "The presence of his fingerprints at the scene; "it was evidence" of his involvement."

What are some alternatives to "it was evidence"?

Some alternatives include "it served as proof", "it indicated", or "it demonstrated", depending on the context and the strength of the evidence.

Is it correct to say "that was an evidence" instead of "it was evidence"?

No, "that was an evidence" is not grammatically correct. "Evidence" is generally an uncountable noun, so you should use "that was evidence" or "that was a piece of evidence".

What's the difference between "it was evidence" and "it was proof"?

"It was evidence" suggests that something serves as an indication of a fact, while "it was proof" implies a more definitive and conclusive establishment of a fact. Proof is generally stronger than evidence.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: