Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
it was destroyed
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "it was destroyed" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something has been completely ruined or eliminated in the past. Example: "The old building was in disrepair for years, and finally, it was destroyed by the fire."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Encyclopedias
Alternative expressions(18)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
58 human-written examples
It was destroyed, too.
News & Media
It was destroyed in the attack.
News & Media
It was destroyed in Erbil".
News & Media
It was destroyed during the 1938 hurricane.
News & Media
It was destroyed by his wife Clementine.
News & Media
It was destroyed by bomb-squad technicians.
News & Media
It was destroyed by fire in 1967.
News & Media
(It was destroyed early this month by NATO airstrikes).
News & Media
It was destroyed by the Chinese army in 1959.
News & Media
"There was a lot of contact until it was destroyed.
News & Media
It was destroyed in 1987 in neo-Classical revenge.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "it was destroyed", ensure the context clearly identifies what "it" refers to, preventing ambiguity. For instance, specify "the building was destroyed" instead of relying on vague pronouns.
Common error
Avoid overuse of passive constructions like "it was destroyed" if the active agent is known and relevant. Active voice often creates more engaging and direct writing; consider replacing it with an active sentence such as "The fire destroyed it."
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "it was destroyed" functions as a passive construction. It indicates that the subject (represented by "it") underwent an action, specifically being destroyed. Ludwig AI confirms this usage is grammatically correct and common.
Frequent in
News & Media
64%
Encyclopedias
23%
Wiki
9%
Less common in
Science
2%
Formal & Business
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "it was destroyed" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive construction employed to describe a past event involving ruin or elimination. Ludwig AI confirms this. It appears most commonly in News & Media and Encyclopedic contexts. When using this phrase, ensure clarity regarding what "it" refers to and be mindful of the potential for overuse of passive voice, opting for active voice when appropriate. Alternative phrases like "it was obliterated" or "it was demolished" can add nuance or emphasis depending on the intended meaning.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
it was obliterated
Emphasizes complete removal or disappearance. Differs in intensity and imagery.
it was demolished
Suggests deliberate destruction, often of a structure. Implies a planned act.
it was ruined
Indicates damage that impairs function or value. Broadest term for negative impact.
it was devastated
Highlights the emotional impact of the destruction. Focuses on the aftermath.
it was annihilated
Stresses total destruction, often on a large scale. More forceful than "destroyed".
it was wrecked
Implies violent damage, often involving vehicles or structures. More specific context.
it was shattered
Suggests breaking into many pieces, physically or metaphorically. Adds vivid imagery.
it was wiped out
Indicates complete elimination, often quickly and decisively. Colloquial tone.
it was consumed
Implies destruction by fire or a similar process. Offers a specific cause.
it was eradicated
Suggests complete removal, often of something undesirable. Formal and precise.
FAQs
What can I say instead of "it was destroyed"?
You can use alternatives like "it was obliterated", "it was demolished", or "it was ruined" depending on the context.
Is "it was destroyed" grammatically correct?
Yes, "it was destroyed" is grammatically correct. It's a passive construction indicating that something (represented by "it") underwent the action of being destroyed.
How to use "it was destroyed" in a sentence?
Use "it was destroyed" to describe a past event where something has been ruined or eliminated. For example, "The library was damaged, and a large portion of "it was destroyed" by the flood."
What's the difference between "it was destroyed" and "it destroyed"?
"It was destroyed" is passive, meaning something happened to "it". "It destroyed" is active, meaning "it" caused destruction. For instance, "The fire was accidental, and "it was destroyed" by the fire" versus "The fire destroyed everything in its path".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested