it was dedicated

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it was dedicated" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that has been set aside or devoted to a particular purpose, person, or cause. Example: "The new library was dedicated to the memory of the town's founder during a special ceremony."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

That was its theme and everything in it was dedicated to demonstrating that".

The New York Times - Arts

The reason for its construction, and the saint to whom it was dedicated, are unknown.

Wikipedia

It was dedicated in 2008.

The New York Times

It was dedicated on Sept. 11, 1964.

The New York Times

It was dedicated in 2002.

The New York Times - Travel

It was dedicated last April.

The New Yorker

It was dedicated this summer.

The New York Times

It was dedicated May 1 , 1965

Columbia University

It was dedicated in October 1992.

The New York Times

It was dedicated to Cecil the Lion.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

(More than 200 pages long, it was dedicated to him).

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "it was dedicated", ensure the subject clearly identifies what is being dedicated and the object specifies to whom or what it is dedicated. Clarity is key for effective communication.

Common error

Avoid using "it was dedicated" without clearly specifying what "it" refers to. Ambiguity can confuse readers. Provide clear context or replace "it" with a more descriptive noun.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it was dedicated" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that the subject received the action of being dedicated. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

49%

Academia

21%

Wiki

20%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

7%

Science

2%

Formal & Business

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "it was dedicated" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive construction to describe something being formally set apart for a specific purpose. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is correct and usable in written English. Its prevalence across news media, academic writing, and encyclopedic entries indicates a broad applicability and neutral-to-formal register. When employing this phrase, ensure clarity by explicitly specifying the subject and dedicatee to avoid ambiguity. Common alternatives include "it was devoted" and "it was assigned", though the best choice depends on the specific context and intended nuance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it was devoted

Simple synonym using a different verb to express the same idea.

it was intended for

Focuses on the intended purpose rather than the act of dedication.

it was given over to

Suggests a complete surrender or allocation to a purpose.

it was assigned to

Emphasizes the act of allocation for a particular function.

it was set apart for

Highlights the separation of something for a special use.

it was consecrated to

Implies a sacred or holy dedication.

it was earmarked for

Indicates that funds or resources were specifically allocated.

it was committed to

Highlights a strong sense of obligation and investment.

it was designed for

Focuses on the original design and purpose of the item or space.

it was built in honor of

Specifically highlights that the reason for its creation was to honor somebody.

FAQs

How can I use "it was dedicated" in a sentence?

Use "it was dedicated" to describe something formally set apart for a special purpose. For instance, "The park "it was dedicated" to the town's war veterans" indicates the park's specific purpose as a memorial.

What can I say instead of "it was dedicated"?

You can use alternatives like "it was devoted", "it was intended for", or "it was assigned to" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "it dedicated" instead of "it was dedicated"?

No, "it dedicated" is grammatically incorrect in most contexts. "It was dedicated" uses the passive voice, indicating something was acted upon. "It dedicated" implies the subject performed the act of dedication, which is typically not the intended meaning.

What's the difference between "it was dedicated to" and "it was dedicated by"?

"It was dedicated to" specifies the recipient or purpose of the dedication, whereas "it was dedicated by" indicates who performed the act of dedication.