Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

it was consistent with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it was consistent with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something aligns or agrees with a particular standard, idea, or set of facts. Example: "The findings of the study were consistent with previous research on the topic."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It was consistent with Lane's trajectory.

News & Media

The New York Times

It was consistent with the first two.

"It was consistent with the philosophy.

News & Media

The New York Times

It was consistent with Ali's looks.

News & Media

The New Yorker

It was consistent with the design.

It was consistent with the experimental results.

It was consistent with my parents' work ethic.

It was consistent with the prediction from CFD simulation.

Prosecution experts have said it was consistent with sex.

News & Media

The New York Times

It was consistent with a conception of history that defined black people out of American identity".

"We wanted it because it was consistent with our philosophy," Mr. Wong said.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "it was consistent with" to show alignment between data, actions, or observations and established norms, expectations, or previous findings. This adds credibility and strengthens your argument.

Common error

Avoid using "it was consistent with" for basic comparisons where simpler phrases like "it matched" or "it aligned with" would suffice. Reserve it for situations requiring a more formal or analytical tone.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it was consistent with" functions as a linking phrase to establish a relationship of agreement, conformity, or logical consequence between two elements. Ludwig's examples highlight its use in academic, scientific, and news contexts to validate findings, justify actions, or explain observations.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

53%

Academia

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Wiki

1%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "it was consistent with" is a versatile expression used to denote agreement, alignment, or conformity between elements. Ludwig AI indicates that it is grammatically correct and commonly used, particularly in scientific, academic, and news contexts. The phrase serves to validate findings, justify actions, or explain observations, thereby contributing to the overall credibility and coherence of an argument. While alternatives like "it aligned with" or "it matched with" can be used, "it was consistent with" is especially useful in formal or analytical writing where emphasis is placed on demonstrating alignment with established patterns or prior knowledge.

FAQs

How can I use "it was consistent with" in a sentence?

Use "it was consistent with" to indicate that something aligns or agrees with a particular standard, idea, or set of facts. For instance, "The study's findings "it was consistent with" previous research."

What are some alternatives to "it was consistent with"?

You can use alternatives like "it aligned with", "it matched with", or "it accorded with" depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

When is it appropriate to use "it was consistent with"?

It's appropriate when you want to emphasize that something aligns or agrees with a standard, expectation, or previous observation. It is especially useful in analytical or formal writing.

What's the difference between "it was consistent with" and "it was compatible with"?

"It was consistent with" indicates alignment with expectations or existing data, while "it was compatible with" suggests that two things can coexist or function together without conflict. The former focuses on agreement, while the latter emphasizes coexistence or functionality.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: