it was comprehensive

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it was comprehensive" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe something that is thorough and covers all necessary aspects or details. Example: "The report was well-researched, and it was comprehensive in addressing all the key issues."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

20 human-written examples

But it was comprehensive defeat, nonetheless.

The New York Times - Sports

As a job description it was comprehensive.

The Guardian - Business

Eton always boasted that it was comprehensive.

The Guardian - Opinion

_His statement may not have been so general but it was comprehensive.

University of California, Berkeley

The backlash against the leaked Yahoo memo banning telecommuting work was as swift as it was comprehensive.

The Washington Post

Assad had long argued that peace with Israel was not worth having unless it was comprehensive, involving an Israeli retreat on all fronts.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

40 human-written examples

But it is comprehensive.

The Economist

"It's comprehensive.

The New York Times - Arts

It is comprehensive.

The New York Times

It is comprehensive and easy to understand.

The New York Times

It is comprehensive: it covers all areas of healthcare.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "it was comprehensive" to convey that a subject, report, or analysis covers all necessary details and aspects. This phrase is suitable for both formal and informal contexts to describe the thoroughness of something.

Common error

Avoid using "it was comprehensive" simply to sound authoritative without providing specific details. Ensure your description truly reflects the extensive and complete nature of the subject. Be prepared to provide evidence or examples to support your claim.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it was comprehensive" functions as a descriptive statement, attributing the quality of being thorough and complete to a particular subject. It's often used to summarize or evaluate the extent of something, as supported by Ludwig's examples, such as describing a report, a plan, or an analysis.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

52%

Science

38%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Academia

5%

Wiki

5%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "it was comprehensive" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression that conveys the thoroughness and completeness of a subject. Ludwig's analysis of various sources reveals that it's commonly used in News & Media and Scientific contexts, indicating its versatility and clarity. While appropriate for formal writing, it's essential to use it accurately and avoid it as a filler. Alternatives like "it was thorough" or "it was exhaustive" can add nuance. Remember to ensure that the claim of comprehensiveness is supported by specific details or evidence to maintain credibility.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it was thorough

Replaces "comprehensive" with a synonym emphasizing attention to detail.

it was exhaustive

Suggests a complete and detailed examination, pushing thoroughness to its limit.

it was all-encompassing

Highlights the wide scope and coverage of the subject.

it was inclusive

Focuses on the inclusion of all relevant elements or aspects.

it was extensive

Emphasizes the large scale or reach of something.

it was complete

Indicates that nothing is missing or left out.

it covered everything

A more informal way of saying that all aspects were addressed.

it left nothing out

Emphasizes the absence of omissions, highlighting completeness.

it was in-depth

Signifies a deep and detailed exploration of the topic.

it was far-reaching

Highlights the broad implications and effects of the subject.

FAQs

How can I use "it was comprehensive" in a sentence?

You can use "it was comprehensive" to describe something that is thorough and covers all necessary aspects or details. For instance, "The report was well-researched, and "it was comprehensive" in addressing all the key issues."

What are some alternatives to "it was comprehensive"?

Alternatives include "it was thorough", "it was exhaustive", or "it was all-encompassing", depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is "it was comprehensive" suitable for formal writing?

Yes, "it was comprehensive" is appropriate for formal writing. It clearly and professionally conveys the idea that something is thorough and complete. However, ensure that the context supports the claim of comprehensiveness.

What does it mean when something is described as "it was comprehensive"?

When something is described as "it was comprehensive", it means that it covers all relevant details, aspects, or elements. It suggests a thoroughness and completeness in its scope or coverage.