Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
it was because of
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "it was because of" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to explain the reason or cause of something. Example: "The event was canceled; it was because of the severe weather conditions."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Formal & Business
Science
Alternative expressions(20)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
59 human-written examples
It was because of Biden.
News & Media
"It was because of the public humiliation.
News & Media
It was because of their skills".
News & Media
It was because of the time.
News & Media
And it was because of Dean".
News & Media
It was because of that horrific experience.
News & Media
It was because of my belly.
News & Media
It was because of childcare.
News & Media
Partly it was because of politics.
News & Media
It was because of the tone.
News & Media
And it was because of Daddy's fault.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "it was because of" to clearly state the direct cause of an event or situation. This phrase is effective when you want to emphasize the reason behind something.
Common error
Avoid using "it was because of" in conjunction with other redundant phrases that already indicate causality. For example, instead of saying "It was because of the rain that the game was canceled", simply state "The game was canceled because of the rain".
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "it was because of" functions as a causal connector, linking an outcome or result to its cause. It provides an explanation for why something happened, as seen in Ludwig's examples.
Frequent in
News & Media
53%
Formal & Business
22%
Science
25%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "it was because of" serves as a common and grammatically correct phrase used to explicitly indicate the cause of a certain event or situation. Ludwig confirms that the phrase is usable in written English across various contexts, particularly in News & Media, Formal & Business, and Science. While "it was because of" is generally neutral, alternative phrases like "due to" or "as a result of" may be more appropriate for formal settings. It's crucial to avoid redundancy when using this phrase to maintain clarity and conciseness in writing.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
it was caused by
This is a more direct and simpler way of expressing causation.
because of that
This is a slightly less formal way to express the same causal relationship.
it happened due to
This option is slightly more formal and emphasizes the reason something occurred.
it was a consequence of
This alternative is more formal and highlights the result as an inevitable outcome.
the reason was
This focuses on providing the explanation or justification.
it resulted from
This alternative is more formal and emphasizes the outcome as a direct consequence.
the effect of that was
This alternative emphasizes the impact or outcome of a prior action or event.
it stemmed from
This alternative suggests that the cause originated or developed from something else.
it arose from
This alternative implies that the cause emerged or came into existence.
attributable to
A more formal alternative often used in analytical or scientific contexts.
FAQs
How to use "it was because of" in a sentence?
Use "it was because of" to explain the cause or reason for something. For example, "The project failed; "it was because of" poor planning".
What can I say instead of "it was because of"?
You can use alternatives like "due to", "as a result of", or "caused by" depending on the context.
Which is correct, "it was because of" or "it was due to"?
Both ""it was because of"" and "it was due to" are correct and can be used interchangeably in many contexts. However, "it was due to" might sound slightly more formal.
What's the difference between "it was because of" and "because"?
"It was because of" emphasizes the reason more directly, often following a statement about an outcome. "Because" simply introduces the reason or cause without the added emphasis.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested