Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

it was attributed

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it was attributed" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the source or origin of a statement, idea, or work, indicating that it is credited to a particular person or group. Example: "The quote 'To be or not to be' was attributed to William Shakespeare."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Well, it was attributed to McLuhan with uncharacteristic selflessness by its insistent popularizer, Timothy Leary, who usually gets credit for it himself.

News & Media

Huffington Post

It was attributed to Donald Trump.

News & Media

The New York Times

It was attributed to "well-placed sources".

News & Media

The New York Times

When it was attributed to Vladimir Lenin, most disagreed.

It was attributed to Umenyiora, but Tuck joked that he wanted credit for half.

It was attributed to Churchill, but in this case it wasn't him.

The A.P. account of it was attributed to "several people who have seen the memo".

News & Media

The New York Times

"I know it was attributed somehow to some ingenious advance man from my staff.

News & Media

The New York Times

In the 19th century, it was attributed to Sebastiano del Piombo.

The bombing, aimed at the Uffizi gallery, killed five people; it was attributed to the Mafia.

News & Media

The New York Times

It was attributed to the increased reflection by the lattice array structures.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "it was attributed", ensure that the attribution is accurate and based on reliable sources. Misattributing information can damage your credibility.

Common error

Avoid using "it was attributed" without specifying who or what the statement is attributed to. Vague attribution weakens the claim. Be specific: "It was attributed to a study by the National Institute of Health."

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it was attributed" functions as a passive construction, indicating that a particular statement, idea, or work is credited to a specific source. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English, suggesting its role in providing clarity regarding origins and sources.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

42%

Formal & Business

8%

Less common in

Social Media

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "it was attributed" is a versatile phrase used to indicate the source of information, ideas, or events. As Ludwig AI indicates, the phrase is appropriate for use in written English. Its prevalence in science, news, and formal business contexts highlights its utility across various disciplines. The phrase's grammatical correctness, high source quality, and consistent usage further contribute to its reliability in both academic and general writing. When using "it was attributed", remember to be specific about the source to enhance clarity and credibility.

FAQs

How can I use "it was attributed" in a sentence?

Use "it was attributed" to indicate the source or origin of a statement, idea, or work. For example, "The discovery "it was attributed" to Dr. Smith".

What are some alternatives to "it was attributed"?

You can use alternatives like "it was credited", "it was ascribed", or "it was assigned" depending on the specific context.

What's the difference between "it was attributed" and "it was believed"?

"It was attributed" implies a specific source or reason is given, while "it was believed" suggests a general acceptance without necessarily knowing the origin. For example, "The success "it was attributed" to hard work", versus "The rumor "it was believed" by many people".

Is it better to use "it was attributed to" or name the source directly?

Naming the source directly is often clearer and more impactful, but ""it was attributed" to" is useful when the source is less important than the fact of attribution. For instance, "The error was due to a miscalculation" is stronger than ""it was attributed" to a miscalculation by a junior staff member" if the focus is on the error itself.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: